Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI and CT Scan in Non-Invasive Evaluation of Liver Cirrhosis

MRI and CT Scan in Evaluation of Liver Cirrhosis

Authors

  • Syed Hira Hassan Department of Gastroenterology, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Fida Muhammad Khan Department of Gastroenterology, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Salman Afridi Department of Gastroenterology, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Younas Department of Gastroenterology, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Asif Khan Department of Gastroenterology, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Munazza Ibrahim Department of Gastroenterology, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • . Rafiullah Department of Gastroenterology, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Sajjad Department of Medicine, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v5i12.2157

Keywords:

Liver Cirrhosis, Imaging Modalities, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Computed Tomography (CT) Scan, Diagnostic Accuracy

Abstract

Liver cirrhosis is a chronic, non-reversible disease which results from fibrosis of the healthy liver tissue and compromise of its functioning. Adequate diagnostic procedures that do not involve invasive procedures are necessary for early diagnosis of cirrhosis to minimize the risk of complications. Even though liver biopsy is considered the gold standard, this procedure is invasive and thus, non-invasive imaging studies, including Megnatic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography scan must be further emphasized. Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of combination imaging techniques MRI and CT scan in the non-invasive assessment of liver cirrhosis taking histopathology as gold standard. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the department of Gastroenterology, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, during the period 1st July 2023 till 30th June 2024. Male and female patients aging 18 to 80 years with suspected liver cirrhosis on ultrasound were enrolled. MRI and CT scan of the liver were carried out and the findings were compared with histopathology to draw the diagnostic accuracy. Results: The study comprised of 75 (58.6%) male and 53 (41.4%) female. The mean age was 55.4 ± 7.2 years. Liver morphology in patients with cirrhosis had sensitivity of 96.8% and specificity of 100%, with the PPV of 100% and NPV of 33.3%. For vascular features the sensitivity was 88.9% and a specificity of 30.0% respectively, with the PPV of 93.7% and an NPV of 18.7%. As an imaging finding, ascites had a sensitivity of 46.0% and a specificity of 59.6%, with a PPV of 62.5% and an NPV of 43.0%. Conclusion: Combining non-invasive imaging modalities like MRI and CT scan enhances the diagnostic accuracy in detecting liver cirrhosis and the degree of fibrosis.

References

Soresi M, Giannitrapani L, Cervello M, Licata A, Montalto G. Non-Invasive Tools for the Diagnosis of Liver Cirrhosis. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2014 Dec; 20(48): 18131-50. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i48.18131.

Singh S, Hoque S, Zekry A, Sowmya A. Radiological Diagnosis of Chronic Liver Disease and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review. Journal of Medical Systems. 2023 Jul; 47(1): 73. doi: 10.1007/s10916-023-01968-7.

D'Amico G, Garcia-Tsao G, Pagliaro L. Natural History and Prognostic Indicators of Survival in Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review of 118 Studies. Journal of Hepatology. 2006 Jan; 44(1): 217-231. doi:10.1002/hep.30635.

Nayak A, Baidya Kayal E, Arya M, Culli J, Krishan S, Agarwal S, et al. Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Cirrhosis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma using Multi-Phase Abdomen CT. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery. 2019 Aug; 14(8): 1341-1352. doi: 10.1007/s11548-019-01991-5.

Aubé C, Bazeries P, Lebigot J, Cartier V, Boursier J. Liver Fibrosis, Cirrhosis, and Cirrhosis-Related Nodules: Imaging Diagnosis and Surveillance. Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging. 2017 Jun; 98(6): 455-468. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2017.03.003.

Okada M, Aoki R, Nakazawa Y, Tago K, Numata K. CT and MR Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Liver Cirrhosis. Gastroenterology Insights. 2024; 15(4): 976-997. doi: 10.3390/gastroent15040068.

Yeom SK, Lee CH, Cha SH, Park CM. Prediction of Liver Cirrhosis, using Diagnostic Imaging Tools. World Journal of Hepatology. 2015 Aug; 7(17): 2069-2079. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i17.2069.

Kudo M, Zheng RQ, Kim SR, Okabe Y, Osaki Y, Iijima H, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Imaging for Liver Cirrhosis Compared to Histologically Proven Liver Cirrhosis. A Multicenter Collaborative Study. Intervirology. 2008; 51(1): 17-26. doi: 10.1159/000122595.

Loomba R and Adams LA. Advances in Non-Invasive Assessment of Hepatic Fibrosis. Gut. 2020 Jul; 69(7): 1343-1352. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317593.

Singh D and Kaushik C. Comparative Analysis of CT and MRI in Emergency Assessment of Stroke: A Review. Journal of Multidisciplinary Research in Healthcare. 2019 Apr; 5(2): 57-63. doi: 10.15415/jmrh.2019.52007.

Liu W, Liu J, Xiao W, Luo G. A Diagnostic Accuracy Meta-Analysis of CT and MRI for the Evaluation of Small Bowel Crohn Disease. Academic Radiology. 2017 Oct; 24(10): 1216-1225. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.04.013.

Lu K, Sui J, Yu W, Chen Y, Hou Z, Li P, et al. An Analysis of the Burden of Liver Cirrhosis: Differences between the Global, China, the United States and India. Liver International. 2024 Dec; 44(12): 3183-203. doi: 10.1111/liv.16087.

Basha MAA, AlAzzazy MZ, Ahmed AF, Yousef HY, Shehata SM, El Sammak DAEA, et al. Does A Combined CT and MRI Protocol Enhance the Diagnostic Efficacy of LI-RADS in the Categorization of Hepatic Observations? A Prospective Comparative Study. European Radiology. 2018 Jun; 28(6): 2592-2603. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5232-y.

Wang G, Zhu S, Li X. Comparison of Values of CT and MRI Imaging in the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Analysis of Prognostic Factors. Oncology Letters. 2019 Jan; 17(1): 1184-1188. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9690.

Kim HA, Kim KA, Choi JI, Lee JM, Lee CH, Kang TW, et al. Comparison of Biannual Ultrasonography and Annual Non-Contrast Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging as Surveillance Tools for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: A Study Protocol. BMC Cancer. 2017 Dec; 17(1): 877. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3819-y.

Higaki A, Kanki A, Yamamoto A, Ueda Y, Moriya K, Sanai H, et al. Liver Cirrhosis: Relationship Between Fibrosis-Associated Hepatic Morphological Changes and Portal Hemodynamics using Four-Dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Japanese Journal of Radiology. 2023 Jun; 41(6): 625-636. doi: 10.1007/s11604-023-01388-0.

Wang C, Huang Y, Liu C, Liu F, Hu X, Kuang X, et al. Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension Using CT- and MRI-based Vascular Model. Radiology. 2023 Apr; 307(2): 221648. doi: 10.1148/radiol.221648.

Sangster GP, Previgliano CH, Nader M, Chwoschtschinsky E, Heldmann MG. MDCT Imaging Findings of Liver Cirrhosis: Spectrum of Hepatic and Extrahepatic Abdominal Complications. HPB Surgery. 2013; 2013(1). doi: 10.1155/2013/129396.

Hochhegger B, Zanon M, Patel PP, Verma N, Eifer DA, Torres PP, et al. The Diagnostic Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared to Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Fat-Containing Thoracic Lesions. The British Journal of Radiology. 2022 Dec; 95(1140). doi: 10.1259/bjr.20220235.

Im WH, Song JS, Jang W. Noninvasive Staging of Liver Fibrosis: Review of Current Quantitative CT and MRI-Based Techniques. Abdominal Radiology. 2022 Sep; 47(9): 3051-3067. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03181-x.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31
CITATION
DOI: 10.54393/pjhs.v5i12.2157
Published: 2024-12-31

How to Cite

Hassan, S. H., Khan, F. M., Afridi, S., Younas, M., Khan, A., Ibrahim, M., Rafiullah, ., & Sajjad, M. (2024). Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI and CT Scan in Non-Invasive Evaluation of Liver Cirrhosis: MRI and CT Scan in Evaluation of Liver Cirrhosis. Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences, 5(12), 76–80. https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v5i12.2157

Issue

Section

Original Article

Plaudit

Most read articles by the same author(s)