The Functional Outcome of Patients Treated with Proximal Femoral Nail (Pfn) for Sub Trochanteric Femur Fracture in Ayyub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad

Patients Treated with Proximal Femoral Nail (Pfn) for Sub Trochanteric Femur Fracture

Authors

  • Muhammad Younas Department of Orthopedic, Ayyub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad, Pakistan
  • Syed Usman Shah Department of Orthopedic, Ayyub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad, Pakistan
  • Abidur Rehman Department of Orthopedic, Ayyub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad, Pakistan
  • Amina Gul Shehzar Khan Department of Orthopedic, Ayyub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Shoaib Zardad Department of Orthopedic, Ayyub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad, Pakistan
  • Shahzad Ahmed Department of Orthopedic, Ayyub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad, Pakistan
  • Ratib Kamal Department of Orthopedic, Ayyub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v5i09.2178

Keywords:

Sub-Trochanteric Femur Fractures, Proximal Femoral Implant, Functional Outcomes, Harris hip score

Abstract

Sub-trochanteric femur fractures are challenging for orthopedic surgeons to fix owing to their location and associated consequences. Different intramedullary and extra-medullary implant stabilization techniques have been explored with varying degrees of effectiveness. Objective: To assess the functional outcomes of proximal femoral nail in patients treated for sub-trochanteric femur fracture. Methods: This cross-sectional study investigated 28 patients of sub trochanteric femur fracture treated with proximal femoral nail in Orthopedic Unit of Ayub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad from January 2021 to March 2024. Patients aged≥20 years who suffered from sub-trochanteric femur fracture and fit for surgery were included. All the patients were immobilized before surgery. Skin traction was applied and prepared for surgery. Postoperative outcome was assessed using the Harris hip score. Results: The overall mean age was 56 ± 10.8 years. Out of 28 cases, there were 18 (64.3%) male and 12 (35.7%) female. The overall mean of hospital duration was 14 ± 4.6 days. The majority of patients were 41-60 years old. Postoperative independence of ambulation was assessed in each patient after three, five, and six months. After 5 months, only two patients were unable to move around unassisted. Based on the Harris Hip Score, the incidence of exceptional, good, and fair outcomes was 6 (21.4%), 5 (17.9%), and 17 (60.7%) respectively. Conclusion: It was concluded that sub-trochanteric femur fractures can be treated with a proximal femoral implant, which offers advantages in terms of increased stability, quick disposition and minimal exposure.

References

Inam M, Ali S, Rahman W, Faisal Z. Functional Outcome After Proximal Femoral Nail in Sub Trochanteric Fracture of Femur. Pakistan Journal of Surgery. 2023 Apr; 39(2).

Avate S, Gaonkar KL, Vatsa M, Kumari L, Patil S. Functional Outcome of Inter-Trochanteric and Sub-Trochanteric Fracture Femur Treated with Proximal Femur Nail Autorotation-II. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2023 Feb; 16(12): 5884-8. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2023.00953.

Panda A, Sil B, Saha P. Outcome of Sub Trochanteric Fractures Managed by Proximal Femoral Nail: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Teaching Hospital of North East India. European Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine. 2023 Jan; 13(1).

Ashraf J, Kumar A, Khan R, Mittal S. Management of Sub Trochanteric Fractures of Femur: A Narrative Review. Journal of Musculoskeletal Surgery and Research. 2020 Apr; 4: 72. doi: 10.4103/jmsr.jmsr_6_20.

Mohamed AH, Mahmoud AA, El Greatly ME, Sakr YM. Fixation of Sub-Trochanteric Fracture Femur by Dynamic Condylar Screw versus Proximal Femoral Nail, A prospective randomized study. Medicine Updates. 2023 Oct; 15(15): 33-45. doi: 10.21608/muj.2023.218898.1141.

Smit Jakheria D, Mitna N, Dubey V, Singh J. Analysis of Pertrochanteric Fractures Managed by Intramedullary or Extramedullary Fixation. International Journal of Orthopaedics. 2020; 6(2): 280-3. doi: 10.22271/ortho.2020.v6.i2e.2049.

Goel K and Taneja DK. Proximal Femoral Nail V/S Dynamic Hip Screw in Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fracture Femur. Indian Journal of Orthopedics. 2018 Jul; 4(3): 249-55. doi: 10.18231/2395-1362.2018.0050.

Hao Y, Zhang Z, Zhou F, Ji H, Tian Y, Guo Y et al. Risk Factors for Implant Failure In Reverse Oblique and Transverse Intertrochanteric Fractures Treated with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (Pfna). Journal of Orthopedic Surgery and Research. 2019 Dec; 14: 1-8. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1414-4.

Inam M, Tariq M, Jamil M. Functional Outcomes of Sub-Trochanteric Femur Fracture Fixed with Dynamic Condylar Screw. National Journal of Health Sciences. 2024 Jun; 9(2): 104-9. doi: 10.21089/njhs.92.0104.

Kasha S and Yalamanchili RK. Management of Sub-Trochanteric Fractures by Nail Osteo-Synthesis: A Review of Tips and Tricks. International Orthopedics. 2020 Apr; 44: 645-53. doi: 10.1007/s00264-019-04404-z.

Joyo MR, Shah GA, Javed MI, Ahmed N. Niaz Hussain keerio. Aftab Alam Khanzada et al. Outcomes of Retrograde Nailing for Treating Fractures of Femoral Shaft. Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science. 2021; 9(9): 223-6.

Grønhaug KM. Intramedullary Nails in the Treatment of Trochanteric and Sub-Trochanteric Fractures 2023; 9(2): 01-15.

Krishna CS and Rao DR. Study on Functional Outcome of Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures Treated with Proximal Femoral Nail. Indian Journal of Orthopedics. 2019 Jul; 5(3): 210-7. doi: 10.18231/j.ijos.2019.040.

Bukhari RR, Ambade R, Palsodkar P. A Prospective Study Of Clinico-Radiological Outcome Assessment in Proximal Femoral Fractures Treated with Proximal Femoral Nail. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine. 2020; 7: 1861-7.

Nath RG and Ansari S. Role of Proximal Femoral Locking Plate in Treatment of Sub-Trochanteric Fractures. Medpulse International Journal of Orthopedics. 2017 Jul; 3(1): 1-7.

Ibrahim S and Meleppuram JJ. A Retrospective Analysis of Surgically-Treated Complex Proximal Femur Fractures with Proximal Femoral Locking Compression Plate. Revista Brasileira de Orthopedic. 2017; 52(06): 644-50. doi: 10.1016/j.rbo.2016.10.011.

Kachewar VB, Pundkar GN, Bute BD, Wankhade UG. Comparative Study of the Clinical and Radiological Outcome of Subtrochanteric Fracture Femur Fixed by Dynamic Condylar Screw (DCS) and Long Proximal Femur Nail (PFN). Indian Journal of Orthopedics Surgery. 2023 Jan; 6(4): 311-5. doi: 10.18231/j.ijos.2020.057.

Srinivasarao B, Kumar TK, Srinivas M, Sivaiah T. Evaluation of Result of Proximal Femoral Nail in Trochanteric and Sub Trochanteric Femur-an Observational Descriptive Study. European Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine. 2024 Jan; 14(1).

Srimannarayana A and Apparao D. Evaluation of Functional Outcome of Subtrochantric Fracture of Femur Managed by Proximal Femoral Nail: A Prospective Study. International Journal of Orthopedics. 2020; 6(2): 860-3. doi: 10.22271/ortho.2020.v6.i2n.2153.

Taqi MU, Tasneem MU, Akhtar MU, Naqshband MS, Faraz SY, Gillani SH et al. Treatment and Outcomes of Proximal Femoral Locking Plate Versus Proximal Femoral Nail in Unstable Pert-Trochanteric Fractures (Boyd and Griffin Type III & IV). Pakistan Journal of Medical Health Science. 2021; 15(1): 133-6.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-30
CITATION
DOI: 10.54393/pjhs.v5i09.2178
Published: 2024-09-30

How to Cite

Younas, M., Shah, S. U., Rehman, A., Khan, A. G. S., Zardad, M. S., Ahmed, S., & Kamal, R. (2024). The Functional Outcome of Patients Treated with Proximal Femoral Nail (Pfn) for Sub Trochanteric Femur Fracture in Ayyub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad: Patients Treated with Proximal Femoral Nail (Pfn) for Sub Trochanteric Femur Fracture. Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences (Lahore), 5(09), 180–184. https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v5i09.2178

Issue

Section

Original Article

Plaudit