Carvidelol Vs Propanol for Secondary Prophylaxis of Variceal Hemorrhage in Liver Cirrhosis Patients

Efficacy of Carvedilol Vs Propranolol

Authors

  • Muhammad Sohail Primary Health Services, Mardan, Pakistan
  • . Kamran Primary Health Services, Charsadda, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Sajjad Khan Primary Health Services, Bannu, Pakistan
  • Zainab Irshad Department of Pharmacology, Khyber Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Fahim Department of Gastroenterology, MTI Mardan Medical Complex, Mardan, Pakistan
  • Sundus Naeem Primary Health Services, Mardan, Pakistan
  • Inam Ullah Primary Health Services, Mardan, Pakistan
  • Syeda Rubina Gillani Primary Health Services, Nowshera, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v4i04.686

Keywords:

Liver cirrhosis, Primary Prophylaxis, Variceal Hemorrhage, Carvedilol, Propranolol

Abstract

Propranolol and Carvedilol are the currently used medications for main prophylaxis of variceal bleeding. Objective: To investigate the efficacy of carvedilol vs propranolol for prevention of variceal hemorrhage in liver cirrhosis patients. Methods:  This prospective comparative study was carried out on 196 cirrhotic patients in the Gastroenterology Department of Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar in collaboration with Pharmacology department of Khyber Medical University, Peshawar from July 2018 to June 2020. Patients with no prior history of primary variceal prophylaxis treatment and variceal bleeding were enrolled. All the patients were categorized into two groups: Group-I (Carvedilol) and Group-II (propanol). Frank hematemesis, melena, and endoscopic assessment was used for the evaluation of variceal bleeding. Results: Of the total 196 liver cirrhosis patients, Group-I and Group-II had 102 (52%) and 94 (48%) respectively. Ultrasonography found splenomegaly in 88% of cases and moderate to severe ascites in 42.6% of the patients investigated. The success rate of carvedilol and propanol group was 76% and 64.8% respectively. The side-effects and complication rate were significantly lower in Group-I than Group-II. The prevalence of variceal bleeding was 16.7% (n=17) and 11.7% (n=11) respectively. Conclusions: Carvedilol is an excellent treatment alternative for prevention of variceal bleeding than propranolol in terms of side-effects and complications rate.

 

References

Abd ElRahim AY, Fouad R, Khairy M, Elsharkawy A, Fathalah W, Khatamish H, et al. Efficacy of carvedilol versus propranolol versus variceal band ligation for primary prevention of variceal bleeding. Hepatology international. 2018 Jan; 12: 75-82. doi: 10.1007/s12072-017-9835-9.

Jachs M and Reiberger T. Prevention of variceal bleeding and rebleeding by nonselective beta-blockers: a tailored approach. Clinics in Liver Disease. 2021 May; 25(2): 311-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cld.2021.01.004.

Reiberger T, Ulbrich G, Ferlitsch A, Payer BA, Schwabl P, Pinter M, et al. Carvedilol for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients with haemodynamic non-response to propranolol. Gut. 2013 Nov; 62(11): 1634-41. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-304038.

Villanueva C, Albillos A, Genescà J, Garcia-Pagan JC, Calleja JL, Aracil C, Bañares R, Morillas RM, Poca M, Peñas B, Augustin S. β blockers to prevent decompensation of cirrhosis in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension (PREDESCI): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. The lancet. 2019 Apr; 393(10181): 1597-608. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31875-0.

Angeli P, Bernardi M, Villanueva C, Francoz C, Mookerjee RP, Trebicka J, et al. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Journal of Hepatology. 2018 Aug; 69(2): 406-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.024.

Puente A, Hernández‐Gea V, Graupera I, Roque M, Colomo A, Poca M, et al. Drugs plus ligation to prevent rebleeding in cirrhosis: an updated systematic review. Liver International. 2014 Jul; 34(6): 823-33. doi: 10.1111/liv.12452.

Albillos A, Zamora J, Martínez J, Arroyo D, Ahmad I, De‐la‐Peña J, et al. Stratifying risk in the prevention of recurrent variceal hemorrhage: results of an individual patient meta‐analysis. Hepatology. 2017 Oct; 66(4): 1219-31. doi: 10.1002/hep.29267.

Mandorfer M, Hernández-Gea V, Reiberger T, García-Pagán JC. Hepatic venous pressure gradient response in non-selective beta-blocker treatment—is it worth measuring?. Current Hepatology Reports. 2019 Jun; 18: 174-86. doi: 10.1007/s11901-019-00469-x.

Stanley AJ, Dickson S, Hayes PC, Forrest EH, Mills PR, Tripathi D, et al. Multicentre randomised controlled study comparing carvedilol with variceal band ligation in the prevention of variceal rebleeding. Journal of Hepatology. 2014 Nov; 61(5): 1014-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.06.015.

Sinha R, Lockman KA, Mallawaarachchi N, Robertson M, Plevris JN, Hayes PC. Carvedilol use is associated with improved survival in patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites. Journal of Hepatology. 2017 Jul; 67(1): 40-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.02.005.

McDowell HR, Chuah CS, Tripathi D, Stanley AJ, Forrest EH, Hayes PC. Carvedilol is associated with improved survival in patients with cirrhosis: a long‐term follow‐up study. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2021 Feb; 53(4): 531-9. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-bsgcampus.23.

Téllez L and Albillos A. Non-selective beta-blockers in patients with ascites: the complex interplay among the liver, kidney and heart. Liver International 2022 Apr; 42(4):749–761. doi: 10.1111/liv.15166.

Sersté T, Melot C, Francoz C, Durand F, Rautou PE, Valla D, et al. Deleterious effects of beta‐blockers on survival in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites. Hepatology. 2010 Sep; 52(3): 1017-22. doi: 10.1002/hep.23775.

De Franchis R. Expanding consensus in portal hypertension: Report of the Baveno VI Consensus Workshop: Stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension. Journal of Hepatology. 2015 Sep; 63(3): 743-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.12.022.

Tourabi HE, Amin AE, Shaheen M, Woda SA, Homeida M, Harron DW. Propranolol reduces mortality in patients with portal hypertension secondary to schistosomiasis. Annals of Tropical Medicine & Parasitology. 1994 Jan; 88(5): 493-500. doi: 10.1080/00034983.1994.11812896.

Rakotozafy JCR, Tanamasoandro R, Rakotoarimanana R, Raherimandimby H, Randriamamonjy F, Rasoloherimampiononiaina MR, et al. Schistosoma mansoni infestation rate evaluation by Kato Katz's Method in Haute Matsiatra Region (Madagascar) School Environment. International Journal of Prevention and Treatment. 2016; 5(2): 22–4.

Abid S, Ali S, Baig MA, Waheed AA. Is it time to replace propranolol with carvedilol for portal hypertension?. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2015 May; 7(5): 532. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i5.532.

Kim SG, Kim TY, Sohn JH, Um SH, Seo YS, Baik SK, et al. A randomized, multi-center, open-label study to evaluate the efficacy of carvedilol vs. propranolol to reduce portal pressure in patients with liver cirrhosis. Official journal of the American College of Gastroenterology| ACG. 2016 Nov; 111(11): 1582-90. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.327.

Pariente A. Should we leave propranolol for carvedilol to treat portal hypertension?. Hépato-Gastro & Oncologie Digestive. 2013 May; 20(5): 385-90.

Tripathi D, Ferguson JW, Kochar N, Leithead JA, Therapondos G, Mcavoy NC, et al. Randomized controlled trial of carvedilol versus variceal band ligation for the prevention of the first variceal bleed. Hepatology. 2009 Sep; 50(3): 825-33. doi: 10.1002/hep.23045.

Shah HA, Azam Z, Rauf J, Abid S, Hamid S, Jafri W, et al. Carvedilol vs. esophageal variceal band ligation in the primary prophylaxis of variceal hemorrhage: a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Journal of Hepatology. 2014 Apr; 60(4): 757-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.11.019.

Gupta V, Rawat R, Saraya A. Carvedilol versus propranolol effect on hepatic venous pressure gradient at 1 month in patients with index variceal bleed: RCT. Hepatology International. 2017 Mar; 11: 181-7. doi: 10.1007/s12072-016-9765-y.

Malandris K, Paschos P, Katsoula A, Manolopoulos A, Andreadis P, Sarigianni M, et al. Carvedilol for prevention of variceal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Gastroenterology. 2019 May; 32(3): 287. doi: 10.20524/aog.2019.0368.

Yang J, Ge K, Chen L, Yang JL. The efficacy comparison of carvedilol plus endoscopic variceal ligation and traditional, nonselective β-blockers plus endoscopic variceal ligation in cirrhosis patients for the prevention of variceal rebleeding: a meta-analysis. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2019 Dec; 31(12): 1518-26. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001442.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-30
CITATION
DOI: 10.54393/pjhs.v4i04.686
Published: 2023-04-30

How to Cite

Sohail, M. ., Kamran, ., Sajjad Khan, M. ., Irshad, Z. ., Fahim, M. ., Naeem, S. ., Ullah, I. ., & Rubina Gillani, S. . (2023). Carvidelol Vs Propanol for Secondary Prophylaxis of Variceal Hemorrhage in Liver Cirrhosis Patients : Efficacy of Carvedilol Vs Propranolol . Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences, 4(04), 62–66. https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v4i04.686

Issue

Section

Original Article

Plaudit

Most read articles by the same author(s)