Acute Biliary Stone-Induced Pancreatitis: The Outcomes of Early vs. Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Early Versus Delayed Cholecystectomy

Authors

  • Muhammad Shabbir Ahmad Department of Surgery, Postgraduate Medical Institute, Ameer-Ud-Din Medical College, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Saeed Mehmood Department of Surgery, Postgraduate Medical Institute, Ameer-Ud-Din Medical College, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Kareemullah Department of Surgery, Postgraduate Medical Institute, Ameer-Ud-Din Medical College, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Rashid Department of Surgery, Postgraduate Medical Institute, Ameer-Ud-Din Medical College, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Babar Hameed Department of Surgery Unit II, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Hafiz Muhammad Imran Department of Surgery Unit II, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Rana Hamad Ullah Pak Red Crescent Medical & Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v5i09.2110

Keywords:

Acute Biliary Pancreatitis, Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, Postoperative Complications, Recurrence Rate, Recovery Time

Abstract

Gallstones often lead to biliary pancreatitis. While the majority of individuals may only have minor symptoms, a small percentage (around 20%) will develop severe pancreatitis, which can lead to catastrophic problems if it occurs again. Objective: To determine patients who have acute pancreatitis caused by biliary stones and evaluate the results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed early versus delayed. Methods: Total 390 patients with acute biliary stone-induced pancreatitis were presented in this study. After getting informed written consent detailed demographics of enrolled cases were recorded. In the group I, laparoscopic cholecystectomy was done within 72 hours; in the group II, it was done later after 72hours. Post-operative outcomes were compared by using t-test and chi square test among both groups. Results: Among all, 216 (55.4%) were males and 174 (44.6%) were females. Majority of the cases 140 (35.9%) had age 41-50 years. Most common complication was abdomen pain in 340 (87.2%) cases. Compared to delayed surgery, early laparoscopic cholecystectomy had a lesser complication rate (p<0.04), a shorter inpatient stay (p<0.003), and a faster recovery time. The mortality rates of the two groups were comparable (p=0.001). Less recurrence rate was experienced with early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (p<0.002). Conclusions: Compared to a late cholecystectomy, an early one greatly reduces the likelihood of postoperative complications, recurrent biliary events, the length of operation, and the length of time the patient must remain in the hospital for treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis.

References

Chandak U, Pind V, Mitra A, Bansod PY, Gaikwad U, Ramteke P. Early versus late laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute biliary pancreatitis: a prospective randomised study. International Surgery Journal. 2022 Aug; 9(9): 1559-65. doi: 10.18203/2349-2902.isj20222059.

Zilio MB, Eyff TF, Azeredo-Da-Silva AL, Bersch VP, Osvaldt AB. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the aetiology of acute pancreatitis. Hpb. 2019 Mar; 21(3): 259-67. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.08.003.

Davoodabadi A, Beigmohammadi E, Gilasi H, Arj A. Optimizing cholecystectomy time in moderate acute biliary pancreatitis: a randomized clinical trial study. Heliyon. 2020 Feb; 6(2). doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03388.

Vege SS, DiMagno MJ, Forsmark CE, Martel M, Barkun AN. Initial medical treatment of acute pancreatitis: American Gastroenterological Association Institute technical review. Gastroenterology. 2018 Mar; 154(4): 1103-39. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.031.

Cho JH, Kim TN, Kim SB. Comparison of clinical course and outcome of acute pancreatitis according to the two main etiologies: alcohol and gallstone. BioMed Central Gastroenterology. 2015 Dec; 15: 1-7. doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0323-1.

Moody N, Adiamah A, Yanni F, Gomez D. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of early versus delayed cholecystectomy for mild gallstone pancreatitis. Journal of British Surgery. 2019 Oct; 106(11): 1442-51. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11221.

Matta B, Gougol A, Gao X, Reddy N, Talukdar R, Kochhar R et al. Worldwide variations in demographics, management, and outcomes of acute pancreatitis. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2020 Jun; 18(7): 1567-75. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.11.017.

Zhong FP, Wang K, Tan XQ, Nie J, Huang WF, Wang XF. The optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis: A meta-analysis. Medicine. 2019 Oct; 98(40): e17429. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017429.

Bougard M, Barbier L, Godart B, Le Bayon-Bréard AG, Marques F, Salamé E. Management of biliary acute pancreatitis. Journal of Visceral Surgery. 2019 Apr; 156(2): 113-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2018.08.002.

Prasanth J, Prasad M, Mahapatra SJ, Krishna A, Prakash O, Garg PK et al. Early versus delayed cholecystectomy for acute biliary pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Journal of Surgery. 2022 Jun; 46(6): 1359-75. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06501-4.

Riquelme F, Marinkovic B, Salazar M, Martínez W, Catan F, Uribe-Echevarría S et al. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy reduces hospital stay in mild gallstone pancreatitis. A randomized controlled trial. HPB. 2020 Jan; 22(1): 26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.05.013.

Walayat S, Baig M, Puli SR. Early vs late cholecystectomy in mild gall stone pancreatitis: An updated meta-analysis and review of literature. World Journal of Clinical Cases. 2021 May; 9(13): 3038. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i13.3038.

Omar MA and Hamed MN. Acute biliary pancreatitis-optimal time for cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study. General Surgery. 2018; 3(7).

Dubina ED, de Virgilio C, Simms ER, Kim DY, Moazzez A. Association of early vs delayed cholecystectomy for mild gallstone pancreatitis with perioperative outcomes. Journal of the American Medical Association Surgery. 2018 Nov; 153(11): 1057-9. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.2614.

Alshamy AE, Hatem SS, Kamal ME, Mohammed I. Comparative Study between Early versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Mild Acute Gallstone Pancreatitis. The Medical Journal of Cairo University. 2021 Dec; 89(December): 2571-81. doi: 10.21608/mjcu.2021.217398.

Mueck KM, Wei S, Pedroza C, Bernardi K, Jackson ML, Liang MK et al. Gallstone pancreatitis: admission versus normal cholecystectomy-a randomized trial (gallstone PANC Trial). Annals of Surgery. 2019 Sep; 270(3): 519-27. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003424.

Jee SL, Jarmin R, Lim KF, Raman K. Outcomes of early versus delayed cholecystectomy in patients with mild to moderate acute biliary pancreatitis: a randomized prospective study. Asian Journal of Surgery. 2018 Jan; 41(1): 47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.07.010.

Noel R, Arnelo U, Lundell L, Hammarqvist F, Jumaa H, Enochsson L et al. Index versus delayed cholecystectomy in mild gallstone pancreatitis: results of a randomized controlled trial. Hpb. 2018 Oct; 20(10): 932-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.03.016.

Da Costa DW, Bouwense SA, Schepers NJ, Besselink MG, van Santvoort HC, Van Brunschot S et al. Same-admission versus interval cholecystectomy for mild gallstone pancreatitis (PONCHO): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2015 Sep; 386(10000): 1261-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00274-3.

Siddiqui T, MacDonald A, Chong PS, Jenkins JT. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. The American Journal of Surgery. 2008 Jan; 195(1): 40-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.03.004.

Skouras C, Jarral O, Deshpande R, Zografos G, Habib N, Zacharakis E. Is early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis preferable to delayed surgery?: best evidence topic (BET). International Journal of Surgery. 2012 Jun; 10(5): 250-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.04.012.

Alburakan AA, Alshunaifi AI, AlRabah RN, Alshammari SA, Aloraini AM, Nouh TA et al. Early versus delayed cholecystectomy in biliary pancreatitis: Experience from a Local Acute Care Surgery Unit in Saudi Arabia. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Dec; 102(48): e36491. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036491.

Khiali R, Ammari S, Nait Slimane N, Drai K, Haicheur EH, Taieb M. Early versus Delayed Cholecystectomy after Mild to Moderate Acute Biliary Pancreatitis: Results of a Comparative Prospective Study. World Journal of Surgery and Surgical Research. 2022; 5. 2022; 1362.

Dai W, Zhao Y, Du GL, Zhang RP. Comparison of early and delayed cholecystectomy for biliary pancreatitis: a meta-analysis. The Surgeon. 2021 Oct; 19(5): 257-62. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2020.06.012.

Lyu YX, Cheng YX, Jin HF, Jin X, Cheng B, Lu D. Same-admission versus delayed cholecystectomy for mild acute biliary pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BioMed Central Surgery. 2018 Dec; 18: 1-0. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0445-9.

Di Martino M, Ielpo B, Pata F, Pellino G, Di Saverio S, Catena F, De Simone B, Coccolini F et al. Timing of cholecystectomy after moderate and severe acute biliary pancreatitis. Journal of the American Medical Association Surgery. 2023 Oct; 158(10): e233660-. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.3660.

Lyu Y, Ye S, Wang B. Outcomes of delayed versus early endoscopic intervention for acute biliary pancreatitis with non-severe acute cholangitis. BioMed Central Surgery. 2022 Dec; 22(1): 440. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01890-8.

Pérez LJ, Parra JF, Dimas GA. The safety of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (< 48 h) for patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Cirugía Española (English Edition). 2014 Feb; 92(2): 107-13. doi: 10.1016/j.cireng.2013.01.009.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-30
CITATION
DOI: 10.54393/pjhs.v5i09.2110
Published: 2024-09-30

How to Cite

Ahmad, M. S., Mehmood, S., Kareemullah, M., Rashid, M., Hameed, B., Imran, H. M., & Hamad Ullah, R. (2024). Acute Biliary Stone-Induced Pancreatitis: The Outcomes of Early vs. Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy : Early Versus Delayed Cholecystectomy. Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences, 5(09), 213–218. https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v5i09.2110

Issue

Section

Original Article

Plaudit