Comparison of Hospital Duration and Analysis of Harmonic Scalpel Surgery with Conventional Protocols in Patients Undergoing Thyroid Surgery

Comparison of Harmonic and Conventional Thyroidectomy

Authors

  • Dharmoon Arija Department of Surgery, Ghulam Muhammad Mahar Medical College, Sukkur, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Ameer Kiani Department of General Surgery, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City Ajman, Ajman, United Arab Emirates
  • Muhammad Nadeem Department of General Surgery, Hayat Memorial Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Allah Nawaz Department of General Surgery, Sargodha Medical College, Sargodha, Pakistan
  • Ahmed Hassan Khan Department of General Surgery, Sargodha Medical College, Sargodha, Pakistan
  • Khalid Mahmood Department of General Surgery, Niazi Medical College Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan
  • Rana Hamad Ullah Pak Red Cresent Medical & Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v5i09.1528

Keywords:

Thyroidectomy, Conventional Protocols, Harmonic Scalpel, Ultrasonic

Abstract

A thyroidectomy is a common surgical procedure, and while traditional methods including electrocautery pose a danger of tissue damage, harmonic scalpels have recently seen a rise in their use for this purpose. Objective: To determine whether or not the Harmonic Scalpel is beneficial in dealing with patients who are undergoing thyroidectomy. Methods: This qusai-experimental study was performed at Department of Surgery, Ghulam Muhammad Mahar Medical College Sukkur from 1st October 2022 to 31st March 2023 and 60 patients were enrolled and divided into 2 equal groups for conventional and harmonic thyroidectomy. Patients with Basedow' illness or thyroid cancer were included regardless of lymph node dissection. For 5mm blood vessel division, 55kHz ultrasound pulses were employed for coagulation. Cutting and coagulation were done using active blade. A well-structured questionnaire recorded operation length, 24-hour drainage volume, hospital stay, post-operative hypocalcaemia, drain placement, RLN paralysis, and blood loss for each patient. Results: There were 78.3% females as compared to the males 21.6%. Less operation time was taken in surgery performed by harmonic scalpel as compared to conventional surgery. Significant difference was observed in intra-operative blood loss in study group. Harmonic scalpel lost 40ml blood whereas traditional surgery lost 124ml. Both research groups had similar post-operative problems. Conclusion: Harmonic scalpel thyroidectomy appeared to be the most reliable and feasible method as compared to conventional surgery protocol in relevance to intra-operative blood loss, surgery duration, total volume drainage.

References

Luo Y, Li X, Dong J, Sun W. A comparison of surgical outcomes and complications between hemostatic devices for thyroid surgery: a network meta-analysis. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2017 Mar; 274: 1269-78. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4190-3.

Ahmed T, Tahir M, Khan I, Khan MI, Parveen S. Comparison of Outcome after Thyroid Surgery Using Harmonic versus Conventional Clamp and Tie Method. Isra Medical Journal. 2018 Sep; 10(5).

Xu SQ, Ma Y, Su HW, Cheng JF, Zhou YX. Comparison of the effects of focus harmonic scalpel and conventional haemostasis on parathyroid function in thyroid surgery. Journal of Ayub Medical College Abbottabad. 2019 Sep; 31(4): 481-4.

Soliman Mohamed S, O Alfy M, Sh Zarad M. Harmonic scalpel versus conventional technique in total thyroidectomy (comparative study). Al-Azhar Medical Journal. 2021 Jan; 50(1): 511-20. doi: 10.21608/amj.2021.147966.

Cordón C, Fajardo R, Ramírez J, Herrera MF. A randomized, prospective, parallel group study comparing the Harmonic Scalpel to electrocautery in thyroidectomy. Surgery. 2005 Mar; 137(3): 337-41. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2004.09.011.

Haq AU, Mahmood T, Kumari S, Afzal A. Harmonic Scalpel Thyroidectomy Versus Conventional Haemostasis Thyroidectomy. International Surgery Journal. 2021 Jan; 8(2): 559-62.

Butskiy O, Chang BA, Luu K, McKenzie RM, Anderson DW. A systematic approach to the recurrent laryngeal nerve dissection at the cricothyroid junction. Journal of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery. 2018 Jan; 47(1): 57. doi: 10.1186/s40463-018-0306-7.

Hirshoren N, Kaganov K, Weinberger JM, Glaser B, Uziely B, Mizrahi I et al. Thyroidectomy practice after implementation of the 2015 American Thyroid Association guidelines on surgical options for patients with well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Journal of the American Medical Association Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery. 2018 May; 144(5): 427-32. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2018.0042.

El Sherpiny WY. A comparative study between harmonic scalpel hemostasis and conventional hemostasis in total thyroidectomy. International Surgery Journal. 2020 Mar; 7(4): 954-60. doi: 10.18203/2349-2902.isj20201372.

Buzdar F, Khan MA, Majeed Ullah Buzdar IA, Laghari HU, Ahmad R. Role of Harmonic Scalpel Versus Conventional Haemostasis Among Patients Undergoing Total Thyroidectomy. International Surgery Journal. 2020; 31(5).

Mehmood B, Nwaz T, Khan MA, Javaid MU, Nadar A, Manzoor S. Comparison of Complications of Harmonic Scalpel Versus Conventional Homeostasis in Patients Undergoing Near-Total Thyroidectomy at a Tertiary Care Hospital. Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences. 2022 Oct; 16(08): 726-. doi: 10.53350/pjmhs22168726.

Sultan HM, Ammar MS, Gaber A, Hagag MG, Abd El Bary AR. Comparative study between Focus harmonic scalpel and conventional hemostasis in open total thyroidectomy. Menoufia Medical Journal. 2018 Jan 1;31(1):175-80.

Noori IF and Mohammad MA. Sutureless Focus Harmonic Thyroidectomy Versus Conventional Clamping and Knot-Tying Technique. Medical Journal of Babylon. 2018 Oct; 15(4): 300-5. doi: 10.4103/MJBL.MJBL_45_18.

Singhal A, Baskota DK, Acharya K. Ultrasonic cutting and coagulation device versus conventional diathermy dissection in thyroid surgery: prospective randomized trial. International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery. 2018 Mar; 4(2): 335-8. doi: 10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20180696.

Ali MNM, Aldardeer AA, Ali AMA, Radwan AA. Total thyroidectomy: conventional suture ligation technique versus sutureless techniques. International Surgery Journal. 2019 May; 6: 1862-9. doi: 10.18203/2349-2902.isj20192355.

Cannizzaro MA, Bianco SL, Borzì L, Cavallaro A, Buffone A. The use of FOCUS Harmonic scalpel compared to conventional haemostasis (knot and tie ligation) for thyroid surgery: a prospective randomized study. Springerplus. 2014 Dec; 3: 1-5. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-639.

Basurto-Kuba EO, Robles-Estrada M, Hurtado-López LM, EDM EO, Campos-Castillo C, Zaldivar-Ramirez FR et al. Safety and Cost-Effectiveness in Thyroidectomy Using the HARMONIC Scalpel Compared to Traditional Hemostasis: A Controlled Clinical Assay. Surgical Technology International. 2017 Jul; 30: 141-7.

Mohamed WB and Ahmed AE. Sutureless versus conventional thyroidectomy. International Surgery Journal. 2017 Mar; 4(4): 1385-8. doi: 10.18203/2349-2902.isj20171147.

Anandaravi BN, Aslam MA, Nair PP. Prospective randomised study using focus harmonic scalpel versus conventional hemostasis for vessel ligation in open thyroid surgery. International Surgery Journal. 2017 Mar; 4(4): 1431-7. doi: 10.18203/2349-2902.isj20171156.

Arora RD, Prajwal SD, Rao KN, Singh A, Nagarkar NM, Abishek AP. A comparison of harmonic scalpel and conventional techniques for Thyroidectomy. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery. 2023 Dec; 75(4): 3410-4. doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-04002-x.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-30
CITATION
DOI: 10.54393/pjhs.v5i09.1528
Published: 2024-09-30

How to Cite

Arija, D., Kiani, M. A., Nadeem, M., Nawaz, A., Khan, A. H., Mahmood, K., & Hamad Ullah, R. (2024). Comparison of Hospital Duration and Analysis of Harmonic Scalpel Surgery with Conventional Protocols in Patients Undergoing Thyroid Surgery: Comparison of Harmonic and Conventional Thyroidectomy. Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences, 5(09), 209–212. https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v5i09.1528

Issue

Section

Original Article

Plaudit