Outcome of Open Versus Closed Reduction of Unilateral Mandibular Sub-Condylar Fracture
Open Versus Closed Reduction of Unilateral Mandibular Sub-Condylar Fracture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v6i2.1877Keywords:
Unilateral Mandibular, Condylar Fractures, Reduction, Occlusion and Mouth OpeningAbstract
Condylar fractures are among the most common types in the maxillofacial area, yet their optimal treatment approach remains debated. Objectives: To compare occlusion and mouth opening between open and closed reduction for unilateral mandibular sub-condylar fractures in adults. Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted on 68 patients in Jamshoro using a non-probability sampling technique. Patients aged 18–50 years with unilateral non-comminuted sub-condylar fractures within 48 hours and sufficient dentition for fixation were included, while those with bilateral fractures, undisplaced condyles, or other exclusion criteria were excluded. Participants were divided into two groups: Group A underwent closed reduction with maxillomandibular fixation, and Group B underwent open reduction with internal fixation using titanium mini-plates under general anesthesia. Occlusion, range of motion, and mouth opening were evaluated at 3-month follow-ups. Results: Pre-operative assessments showed limited mouth opening (15–20 mm) in 97.1% and 100%, poor occlusion in 100%, and poor range of motion in 100% of patients in both groups. Post-operatively, mouth opening improved to 20–30 mm in 8.8% vs. 67.6% and 30–45 mm in 73.5% vs. 85.3%. Good occlusion improved to 58.8%, 88.2%, and 97.1% in Group A vs. 82.4%, 94.1%, and 100% in Group B over 1, 2, and 3 months, respectively. Range of motion also improved, reaching 94.1% vs. 100% by the 3rd month. Conclusions: It was concluded that open reduction with internal fixation was a superior therapeutic option compared to closed reduction for unilateral mandibular sub-condylar fractures
References
Kanala S, Gudipalli S, Perumalla P, Jagalanki K, Polamarasetty PV, Guntaka S et al. Aetiology, Prevalence, Fracture Site and Management of Maxillofacial Trauma. The Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2021 Jan; 103(1): 18-22. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.0171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2020.0171
Brown JS, Khan A, Wareing S, Schache AG. A New Classification of Mandibular Fractures. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2022 Jan; 51(1): 78-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.02.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2021.02.012
Kozakiewicz M and Walczyk A. Current frequency of Mandibular Condylar Process Fractures. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023 Feb; 12(4): 1394. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041394
Barsoum N, El-Wahed A, Nabil Helmi Y. Incidence, Pattern, Etiology of Facial Fractures Among Two Referral Centers (Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study). Egyptian Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2024 Apr; 15(2): 27-47. doi: 10.21608/OMX.2024.268653.1222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/OMX.2024.268653.1222
Gibstein AR, Chen K, Nakfoor B, Gargano F, Bradley JP. Mandibular Sub-Condylar Fracture: Improved Functional Outcomes in Selected Patients with Open Treatment. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2021 Sep; 148(3): 398e-406e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000008294
Memon Z, Naz S, Shaikh AG, Siyal ZH, Shams S. Treatment of Mandibular Condyle Fracture-A Comparison of Two Protocols. The Professional Medical Journal. 2020 Oct; 27(10): 2176-81. doi: 10.29309/TPMJ/2020.27.10.4310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29309/TPMJ/2020.27.10.4310
Mooney S, Gulati RD, Yusupov S, Butts SC. Mandibular Condylar Fractures. Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics. 2022 Feb; 30(1): 85-98. doi: 10.1016/j.fsc.2021.08.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2021.08.007
Lim J, Jo W, Jeon H, Song SI, Lee JK. Condylar Position Changes and Prognosis in Patients with Unilateral Mandibular Condylar Fracture Treated Non-Surgically. Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2024 Dec; 46(1): 42. doi: 10.1186/s40902-024-00454-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-024-00454-5
Sharma G, Shukla D, Bhola N. An Isolated Unilateral Condylar Head Fracture in an Adult Female: A Case Report. Cureus. 2024 Jun; 16(6). doi: 10.7759/cureus.62813. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.62813
Jazayeri HE, Lopez J, Khavanin N, Xun H, Lee UK, Best DL et al. Comparative Benefits of Open Versus Closed Reduction of Condylar Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2023 Apr; 151(4): 664e-72e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000010009
Punga R and Gaur S. Let Bilateral Condylar Fracture Fixation Be the Norm and Not a Choice. Cureus. 2022 May; 14(5). doi: 10.7759/cureus.25492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25492
Cabral LC, Alves GM, Furtado LM, Neto AJ, Júnior PC. Changes in Mandibular and Articular Dynamics Associated with Surgical Versus Nonsurgical Treatment of Mandibular Condylar Fractures: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology. 2020 Apr; 129(4): 311-21. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2019.10.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2019.10.010
Prakash Sr R, Ramesh K, Alwala AM, Porika R, Katkuri S, Prakash R et al. Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Versus Closed Reduction and Maxillomandibular Fixation of Condylar Fractures of the Mandible: A Prospective Study. Cureus. 2022 Jan; 14(1). doi: 10.7759/cureus.21186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.21186
Monarchi G, Catarzi L, Paglianiti M, Valassina D, Balercia P, Consorti G. A Comparative Analysis of Surgical and Conservative Management in Intra-Articular Condylar Fractures: A Retrospective Study. Surgeries. 2024 Nov; 5(4): 1033-42. doi: 10.3390/surgeries5040083. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries5040083
Palanivel I, Narayanan V, Chandran S, Ramakrishnan K, Gurram P. Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Condylar Head/Diacapitular Fracture of Mandible: Case Series. Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery. 2021 Sep; 20: 404-8. doi: 10.1007/s12663-020-01436-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-020-01436-6
Weng L, Cao Y, Zhang G, Zhou H, Liu X, Zhang Y. Response “Commentary: A Comparative Study On Closed Reduction Vs. Open Reduction: Techniques in the Surgical Treatment of Rotated Lateral Condyle Fractures of the Distal Humerus in Children”. Frontiers in Pediatrics. 2023 Sep; 11: 1191933. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1191933. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2023.1191933
Hassan SG, Shams S, Rehman M, Kumar S. Mandibular Condyle Fractures: A 2 Years Study at Liaquat University Hospital. The Professional Medical Journal. 2016 Jun; 23(06): 705-8. doi: 10.17957/TPMJ/16.2905. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17957/TPMJ/16.2905
Hakim TA, Shah AA, Farooq S, Kosar S, Gul S, Mehmood N. Unilateral Sub-Condylar and Condylar Neck Fractures: Randomized Clinical Study. Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery. 2018 Jan; 8(1): 3-9. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_166_17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_166_17
Balouch SS, Sohail R, Awais S, Warraich RA, Sajid MI. Comparison of Functional Outcome After Open and Closed Reduction of Mandibular Sub-Condylar Fracture. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association. 2020; 70(2108).
Patel HB, Desai NN, Matariya RG, Makwana KG, Movaniya PN. Unilateral Condylar Fracture with Review of Treatment Modalities in 30 Cases-An Evaluative Study. Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery. 2021 Jan; 11(1): 37-41. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_312_20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_312_20
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access journal and all the published articles / items are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. For comments
