Comparison of Cervical Vertebral Maturation with Fishman’s Skeletal Maturity Index Method in Assessment of Growth Status

Cervical Vertebral Maturation with Fishman’s Skeletal Maturity Index

Authors

  • Faizan ul Hassan Department of Orthodontics, Rehman Dental College, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Ali Ayub Department of Orthodontics, HBS Medical and Dental College, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Nadeem Hussain Department of Health, Government of Sindh, Pakistan
  • Sarfaraz Hussain Department of Orthodontics, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Madiha Khalid Memon Department of Oral Biology, Muhammad Dental College, Mirpurkhas, Pakistan
  • Ausaf Ali Rizvi Smile Engineers Clinic Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Saba Ayman Bokhari General Dental Practitioner, United Kingdom
  • Ahsan Mehmood Shah Department of Orthodontics, Khyber College of Dentistry, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Salman Shams Department of Oral Medicine, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v3i07.422

Keywords:

Skeletal Maturation, Hand Wrist Radiograph, Cervical Vertebral Maturation

Abstract

Assessment of skeletal maturity is paramount for orthodontists since optimal use and effectiveness of orthodontic and orthopedic appliances depends on it. Objective: To compare the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) with Fishman’s hand wrist radiograph (HWR) method in assessment of growth status. Methods: This comparative cross sectional study was conducted at the Orthodontics department at the Khyber College of dentistry, Peshawar on 100 participants. The patients with 9 to 15 years of age, relatively well aligned arches, both genders, mild to moderate skeletal discrepancy, minimal dental compensations, vertical normal angle, and without temporomandibular joint disorders were included. Along with age and gender, stages of HWR and CVM were recorded.  HWRs were acquired by standardized method and lateral cephalograms were taken in natural head position.  The staging of HWR was done by using Fishman method while CVM staging. Comparison of CVM stages and Fishmann’s HWR stages were done using chi-square test. Results: The mean age was 11.79 ± 1.62 years.   The females were 53(53%) and males were 47(47%). Most common stage of CVM was III (n=33, 33%) followed by IV (n=27, 27%). Similarly, common stage of hand wrist radiograph was III (n=32, 32%) followed by IV (n=28, 28%).There was no statistically significant different between two methods for assessing skeletal growth status (p=0.697). Conclusions: Cervical vertebral maturation can have used as an alternative to hand wrist radiograph for growth assessment without an extra radiation

References

Nugroho MJ, Ismah N, Purbiati M. Orthodontic treatment need assessed by malocclusion severity using the Dental Health Component of IOTN. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research. 2019 Sep; 12(3): 1042-6.

Batista KB, Thiruvenkatachari B, Harrison JE, O’Brien KD. Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2018 Mar; 2018(3): 1-90. doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd003452.pub4

Morris KM, Fields Jr HW, Beck FM, Kim DG. Diagnostic testing of cervical vertebral maturation staging: an independent assessment. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2019 Nov; 156(5): 626-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.11.016

Bozorgnia Y, Moradi M, Molkizade N. The Prevalence of Malocclusion Requiring Early Orthodontic Treatment in 7-11 Years Old Children in Bojnurd, 2018. Journal of North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences. 2021 Feb; 12(4): 66-71.

Zymperdikas VF, Koretsi V, Papageorgiou SN, Papadopoulos MA. Treatment effects of fixed functional appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2016 Apr; 38(2): 113-26. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv034

El-Huni A, Salazar FB, Sharma PK, Fleming PS. Understanding factors influencing compliance with removable functional appliances: a qualitative study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2019 Feb; 155(2): 173-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.06.011

Perinetti G, Contardo L, Castaldo A, McNamara Jr JA, Franchi L. Diagnostic reliability of the cervical vertebral maturation method and standing height in the identification of the mandibular growth spurt. The Angle Orthodontist. 2016 Jul; 86(4): 599-609. doi: 10.2319/072415-499.1

Günen Yılmaz S, Harorlı A, Kılıç M, Bayrakdar İŞ. Evaluation of the relationship between the Demirjian and Nolla methods and the pubertal growth spurt stage predicted by skeletal maturation indicators in Turkish children aged 10–15: investigation study. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2019 Feb; 77(2): 107-13. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2018.1510137

Hägg U and Taranger J. Maturation indicators and the pubertal growth spurt. American Journal of Orthodontics. 1982 Oct; 82(4): 299-309. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(82)90464-X

Mahajan S. Evaluation of skeletal maturation by comparing the hand wrist radiograph and cervical vertebrae as seen in lateral cephalogram. Indian Journal of Dental Research. 2011 Mar; 22(2): 309. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.84310

McNamara Jr JA and Franchi L. The cervical vertebral maturation method: A user's guide. The Angle Orthodontist. 2018 Mar; 88(2): 133-43. doi: 10.2319/111517-787.1

Santiago RC, de Miranda Costa LF, Vitral RW, Fraga MR, Bolognese AM, Maia LC. Cervical vertebral maturation as a biologic indicator of skeletal maturity: a systematic review. The Angle Orthodontist. 2012 Nov; 82(6): 1123-31. doi: 10.2319/103111-673.1

Başaran G, Özer T, Hamamcı N. Cervical vertebral and dental maturity in Turkish subjects. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2007 Apr; 131(4): 447-e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.08.016

Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. An improved version of the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of mandibular growth. Angle Orthodontic. 2002 Aug; 72(4): 316-23. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2002)072<0316:AIVOTC>2.0.CO;2.

Profit WR, Fields HW, Larson BE, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics 6th ed. St Louis: Mosby Elsevier. 2018.

Kamal M and Goyal S. Comparative evaluation of hand wrist radiographs with cervical vertebrae for skeletal maturation in 10-12 years old children. Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. 2006 Jul; 24(3): 127-35. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.27901

Chalasani S, Kumar J, Prasad M, Shetty BS, Kumar TA. An evaluation of skeletal maturation by hand-wrist bone analysis and cervical vertebral analysis: A comparitive study. Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society. 2013 Oct; 47(4_suppl4): 433-7. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10021-1201

Liu Q, Li C, Wanga V, Shepherd BE. Covariate‐adjusted Spearman's rank correlation with probability‐scale residuals. Biometrics. 2018 Jun; 74(2): 595-605. doi: 10.1111/biom.12812

Alkhal HA, Wong RW, Rabie AB. Correlation between chronological age, cervical vertebral maturation and Fishman's skeletal maturity indicators in southern Chinese. The Angle Orthodontist. 2008 Jul; 78(4): 591-6. doi: 10.2319/0003-3219(2008)078[0591:CBCACV]2.0.CO;2

Gandini P, Mancini M, Andreani F. A comparison of hand-wrist bone and cervical vertebral analyses in measuring skeletal maturation. The Angle Orthodontist. 2006 Nov; 76(6): 984-9. doi: 10.2319/070605-217

Downloads

Published

2022-12-31
CITATION
DOI: 10.54393/pjhs.v3i07.422
Published: 2022-12-31

How to Cite

ul Hassan, F. ., Ayub, A. ., Hussain, N. ., Hussain, S. ., Khalid Memon, M., Ali Rizvi, A. ., Ayman Bokhari, S. ., Mehmood Shah, A. ., & Shams, S. (2022). Comparison of Cervical Vertebral Maturation with Fishman’s Skeletal Maturity Index Method in Assessment of Growth Status: Cervical Vertebral Maturation with Fishman’s Skeletal Maturity Index . Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences, 3(07), 118–121. https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v3i07.422

Issue

Section

Original Article

Plaudit