Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Conventional Composite Veneers with Novel Veneer Preparation Design- In Vitro Study
Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Conventional Composite Veneers with Novel Veneer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v6i2.2602Keywords:
Composite, Veneer, Fracture Load, ResistanceAbstract
The patient's primary concern or need for good and pleasing esthetics of anterior teeth has increased. With the progression in the restorative field, multiple treatment options exist for patients’ complaints. Composite veneering is one of the suitable and an appropriate treatment option with classic properties that is a good mechanical property, bend strength, abrasion resistance, and longevity of direct anterior restoration. Objectives: To compare fracture resistance of conventional and novel veneer preparation (a modified form of feather edge preparation) design in the indirect composite veneer method. Methods: In Vitro, a comparative study was conducted at the Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics Dr. Ishrat Ul Ebad Khan Institute of Oral Health Sciences, Dow University of Health Sciences Karachi time duration of six months by using a non-probability consecutive sampling technique. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 26.0. The independent sample T-test was applied to compare the fracture resistance between the two procedures. Results: In terms of fracture load performance, the Conventional Veneer group had an average fracture load of 309.7 ± 126.3 N, compared to 335.5 ± 136.14 N in the Novel Veneer group. Although the Novel Veneer group showed a higher mean fracture load, this difference was statistically significant (p=0.005). Conclusion: It was concluded that increasing fracture resistance of the prepared materials with new preparation designs trends in the present study, however, the obtained data were statistically significant (p-value 0.005).
References
Narula H, Goyal V, Verma KG, Jasuja P, Sukhija SJ, Kakkar A. A Comparative Evaluation of Fractural Strength and Marginal Discrepancy of Direct Composite Veneers using Four Different Tooth Preparation Techniques: An: In Vitro: Study. Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. 2019 Jan; 37(1): 55-9. doi: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_279_18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_279_18
Sorrentino R, Ruggiero G, Borelli B, Barlattani A, Zarone F. Dentin Exposure After Tooth Preparation for Laminate Veneers: A Microscopical Analysis to Evaluate the Influence of Operators’ Expertise. Materials. 2022 Feb; 15(5): 1763. doi: 10.3390/ma15051763. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15051763
Magne P, Perroud R, Hodge JS, Belser UC. Clinical Performance of Novel-Design Porcelain Veneers for the Recovery of Coronal Volume and Length. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry. 2000 Oct; 20(5).
Fradeani M, Redemagni M, Corrado M. Porcelain Laminate Veneers: 6-To 12-Year Clinical Evaluation-A Retrospective Study. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry. 2005 Feb; 25(1): 9-17.
Korkut B. Smile Makeover with Direct Composite Veneers: A Two-Year Follow-Up Report. Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects. 2018 Jun; 12(2): 146. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2018.023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2018.023
Stawarczyk B, Egli R, Roos M, Özcan M, Hämmerle CH. The Impact of in Vitro Aging on the Mechanical and Optical Properties of Indirect Veneering Composite Resins. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2011 Dec; 106(6): 386-98. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60153-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60153-4
Castelnuovo J, Tjan AH, Phillips K, Nicholls JI, Kois JC, of Washington U. Fracture Load and Mode of Failure of Ceramic Veneers with Different Preparations. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2000 Feb; 83(2): 171-80. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(00)80009-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)80009-8
Alothman Y and Bamasoud MS. The Success of Dental Veneers According to Preparation Design and Material Type. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2018 Dec; 6(12): 2402. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.353
Mannocci F, Bitter K, Sauro S, Ferrari P, Austin R, Bhuva B. Present Status and Future Directions: The Restoration of Root Filled Teeth. International Endodontic Journal. 2022 Oct; 55: 1059-84. doi: 10.1111/iej.13796. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13796
Schlichting LH, Resende TH, Reis KR, Dos Santos AR, Correa IC, Magne P. Ultrathin CAD-CAM Glass-Ceramic and Composite Resin Occlusal Veneers for the Treatment of Severe Dental Erosion: An Up to 3-Year Randomized Clinical Trial. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2022 Aug; 128(2): 158-e1. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.02.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.02.009
Elsayed M, Sherif R, El-khodary N. Fracture Resistance of Vita Suprinity Versus IPS E. Max CAD Vonlays Restoring Premolars (An in Vitro Study). International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry. 2020; 6(3): 734-41. doi: 10.22271/oral.2020.v6.i3k.1029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22271/oral.2020.v6.i3k.1029
Al-Ibraheemi ZA, Abdullah HA, Jawad NA, Haider J. Assessing Fracture Resistance of Restored Premolars with Novel Composite Materials: An in Vitro Study. International Journal of Dentistry. 2021; 2021(1): 5512708. doi: 10.1155/2021/5512708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5512708
Alghazzawi TF. Clinical Survival Rate and Laboratory Failure of Dental Veneers: A Narrative Literature Review. Journal of Functional Biomaterials. 2024 May; 15(5): 131. doi: 10.3390/jfb15050131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb15050131
Irmaleny I, Hidayat OT, Handayani RA. Componeer as an Aesthetic Treatment Option for Anterior Teeth: A Case Report. Baseboard Management Controller Oral Health. 2024 Mar; 24(1): 367. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04081-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04081-4
Jurado CA, Mekled S, Abuhammoud S, Azpiazu-Flores FX, Vegh D, Wang T et al. Fracture Resistance of Partial and Complete Coverage Veneers and Ceramic Crowns for Maxillary Central Incisors. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2024 Aug; 132(2): 420-e1. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.04.020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.04.020
Soni PS and Sanyal P. Comparative Evaluation of Two Different Preparation Designs and Materials on the Fracture Resistance of Laminate Veneers: An in Vitro Study. Cureus. 2024 Aug; 16(8). doi: 10.7759/cureus.66811. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.66811
Huang X, Zou L, Yao R, Wu S, Li Y. Effect of Preparation Design on the Fracture Behavior of Ceramic Occlusal Veneers in Maxillary Premolars. Journal of Dentistry. 2020 Jun; 97: 103346. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103346
Sirous S, Navadeh A, Ebrahimgol S, Atri F. Effect of Preparation Design on Marginal Adaptation and Fracture Strength of Ceramic Occlusal Veneers: A systematic review. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research. 2022 Dec; 8(6): 1391-403. doi: 10.1002/cre2.653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.653
Nabil O and Idris AS. Effect of Preparation Design on the Fracture Resistance of Partial Laminate Veneers. An In-vitro Study. Egyptian Dental Journal. 2024 Jul; 70(3): 2659-69. doi: 10.21608/edj.2024.290406.3041. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2024.290406.3041
Tribst JP, Tach Q, de Kok P, Dal Piva AM, Kuijs RH, Kleverlaan CJ. Thickness and Substrate Effect on the Mechanical Behaviour of Direct Occlusal Veneers. International Dental Journal. 2023 Oct 1; 73(5): 612-9. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2022.11.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2022.11.006
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access journal and all the published articles / items are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. For comments
