Per-Operative Predictors of Conversion of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy into Open Procedure : Conversion of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Ramsha Khan; Umar Javed; Atiq ur Rehman

doi:10.54393/pjhs.v4i11.1151

Authors

Ramsha Khan Department of Surgery, Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Bahawalpur, Pakistan
Umar Javed Department of Surgery, Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Bahawalpur, Pakistan
Atiq ur Rehman Department of Surgery, Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Bahawalpur, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v4i11.1151

Keywords:

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, Open Procedure, Cholecystitis

Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a minimally invasive procedure for gallbladder removal, is widely preferred due to its advantages like reduced postoperative pain and quicker recovery. However, in certain cases, this procedure may need to be converted to an open cholecystectomy. The ability to predict such conversions preoperatively is crucial for better surgical planning and patient counseling. Objective: To identify and analyze the per-operative predictors that may necessitate the conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Methods: This study was conducted in Surgical Unit 3 at Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Bahawalpur as a prospective observational study spanning over 6 months from September 2022 to February 2023. All patients who were booked for Laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included. The data of preoperative and perioperative factors were collected on a standard proforma. Operative findings which were analyzed and documented by the surgeon were then, compared to look for the factors that contribute to conversion of Laparoscopic cholecystectomy into open procedure. Results: Mean ± SD of age was 42.59 ± 13.14. Regarding frequency of per-operative findings. It reveals that adhesions were found in 20 (22.7%) of the 88 procedures, difficult anatomy at Callot’s triangle was present in 12 (13.6%) cases, unmanageable bleeding occurred in 4 (4.5%) cases, and damage to nearby structures was observed in 6 (6.8%) procedures. The remaining procedures did not exhibit these issues. Conclusions: Our study has conclusively identified critical per-operative predictors for the conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to an open procedure. These insights are instrumental for preoperative assessment and planning, potentially guiding clinical decisions to optimize patient care and surgical outcomes.

References

Everhart JE and Ruhl CE. Burden of digestive diseases in the United States Part III: Liver, biliary tract, and pancreas. Gastroenterology. 2009 Apr; 136(4): 1134-44. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.02.038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2009.02.038

Sultan AM, El Nakeeb A, Elshehawy T, Elhemmaly M, Elhanafy E, Atef E. Risk factors for conversion during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: retrospective analysis of ten years' experience at a single tertiary referral centre. Digestive Surgery. 2013 Apr; 30(1) :51-5. doi: 10.1159/000347164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000347164

Kaafarani HM, Smith TS, Neumayer L, Berger DH, Depalma RG, Itani KM. Trends, outcomes, and predictors of open and conversion to open cholecystectomy in Veterans Health Administration hospitals. The American Journal of Surgery. 2010 Jul; 200(1): 32-40. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.08.020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.08.020

Channa NA, Khand F, Bhanger MI, Leghari MH. Surgical incidence of Cholelithiasis in Hyderabad and adjoining areas (Pakistan). Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2004 Mar; 20(1).

Hu ASY, Menon R, Gunnarsson R, de Costa A. Risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery - A systematic literature review of 30 studies. The American Journal of Surgery. 2017 Nov; 214(5): 920-930. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.07.029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.07.029

Lengyel BI, Panizales MT, Steinberg J, Ashley SW, Tavakkoli A. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: What is the price of conversion? Surgery. 2012 Aug; 152(2): 173-8. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.02.016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2012.02.016

Amin A, Haider MI, Aamir IS, Khan MS, Khalid Choudry U, Amir M et al. Preoperative and Operative Risk Factors for Conversion of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy to Open Cholecystectomy in Pakistan. Cureus. 2019 Aug; 11(8): e5446. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5446

Wolf AS, Nijsse BA, Sokal SM, Chang Y, Berger DL. Surgical outcomes of open cholecystectomy in the laparoscopic era. The American Journal of Surgery. 2009 Jun; 197(6): 781-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.05.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.05.010

Gabriel R, Kumar S, Shrestha A. Evaluation of predictive factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Kathmandu University Medical Journal. 2009; 7(25): 26–30. doi: 10.3126/kumj.v7i1.1761. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/kumj.v7i1.1761

Kama NA, Doganay M, Dolapci M, Reis E, Atli M, Kologlu M. Risk factors resulting in conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery. Surgical Endoscopy. 2001 Sep; 15(9): 965–8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-0008-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-001-0008-4

Gharaibeh KI, Qasaimeh GR, Al-Heiss H, Ammari F, Bani-Hani K, Al-Jaberi TM et al. Effect of timing of surgery, type of inflammation, and sex on outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. 2002 Jun; 12(3): 193-8. doi: 10.1089/10926420260188092. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/10926420260188092

Chahin F, Elias N, Paramesh A, Saba A, Godziachvili V, Silva YJ. The efficacy of laparoscopy in acute cholecystitis. JSLS: Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. 1999 Apr-Jun; 3(2): 121-5.

Shamim M, Memon AS, Bhutto AA, Dahri MM. Reasons of conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy in a tertiary care institution. JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association. 2009 Jul; 59(7): 456-60.

Shea JA, Healey MJ, Berlin JA, Clarke JR, Malet PF, Staroscik RN et al. Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A meta-analysis. Annals of Surgery. 1996 Nov; 224(5): 609-20. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199611000-00005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199611000-00005