Association of Different Type of Refractive Errors with Parental Cousin Marriages

Refractive Errors with Parental Cousin Marriages

Authors

  • Adan Awais Department of Optometry & Vision Sciences, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Saba Akram Department of Optometry & Vision Sciences, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Duaa Awais University Institute of Physical Therapy, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Ayesha Arshad Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Bahawalpur, Pakistan
  • Zaneera Hassan Spec Savers Australia, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v4i05.537

Abstract

Refractive errors are the major reason of visual impairment and its prevalence has increased over time. Refractive errors affect ocular structures as corneal shape, eye’s axial length, vitreous changes and retinal dystrophies. Uncorrected and high degree of refractive errors are the leading cause of blindness worldwide. Due to several mechanism, there is an increased risk of refractive errors with parental cousin marriages. Objective: To find association of different types of refractive errors in patients with positive history of parental consanguinity, and to evaluate that which type of refractive error is more compromised. Methods: A cross-sectional study accompanied 175 patients having positive history of consanguinity age between 14-35 years was performed at the University of Lahore, Teaching Hospital Pakistan during September 2020 to January 2021. Using non probability convenient sampling technique 175 individuals were evaluated for refractive error type with positive parental consanguinity. To measure distance visual acuity of patients, Standard Snellen chart at (6m) was used. Data were recorded by asking the patients to fill a self-made Performa. Results: Myopic refractive error is most common type of error with consanguinity patients as compare to hyperopic patients. Second most common error occurs myopic astigmatism. Hypermetropia was seen very less with consanguinity history. Refractive errors in total families found 68% with myopia and myopic astigmatism 40%. Conclusions: Refractive errors found more with consanguinity history as compare to patients with absence of consanguinity history.

References

Dandona L and Dandona R. What is the global burden of visual impairment? BMC Medicine. 2006 Dec; 4: 1-0. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-4-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-4-6

Pateras E. Prevalence of refractive errors amongst adults, located at the north suburbs of Athens-Greece. Health Science Journal. 2012 Mar; 6(1): 102.

Ayub Ali IA and Ayub S. Prevalence of undetected refractive errors among school children. Biomedica. 2007 Jul; 23: 96-101.

Latif MZ, Khan MA, Afzal S, Gillani SA, Chouhadry MA. Prevalence of refractive errors; an evidence from the public high schools of Lahore, Pakistan. JPMA. 2019 Apr; 69(4): 464-7.

Awan AR, Jamshed J, Khan MM, Latif Z. Prevalence and causes of visual impairment and blindness among school children in Muzaffarabad, Pakistan. International Journal of Scientific Reports. 2018 Apr; 4(4): 93-8. doi: 10.18203/issn.2454-2156.IntJSciRep20181393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-2156.IntJSciRep20181393

Alsaqr AM. Relationship Between Consanguineous Marriages and Incidence and Severity of Refractive Errors: A Cross-sectional Study. International Journal of Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2019 Nov; 4(4): 81-7. doi: 10.11648/j.ijovs.20190404.15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijovs.20190404.15

Hashemi H, Fotouhi A, Yekta A, Pakzad R, Ostadimoghaddam H, Khabazkhoob M. Global and regional estimates of prevalence of refractive errors: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Current Ophthalmology. 2018 Mar; 30(1): 3-22. doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2017.08.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2017.08.009

Ye H, Qian Y, Zhang Q, Liu X, Cai X, Yu W, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of uncorrected refractive error among an elderly Chinese population in urban China: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2018 Mar; 8(3): 1-6. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021325

Ramachandra K, Gilyaru S, Eregowda A, Yathiraja S. Prevalence of refractive error and the eye morbidity in school children in Bangalore, India. International Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics. 2016;3(1):138-41. doi: 10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20160146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20160146

Hameed A. Screening for refractive errors and visual impairment among. Rawal Medical Journal. 2016 Oct; 41: 437-0.

Latif MZ, Khan MA, Afzal S, Gilani SA. Association of seeking ophthalmic assessment in children with parental history of refractive errors. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2019 May; 35(3): 743. doi: 10.12669/pjms.35.3.1010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.35.3.1010

Hamamy H, Antonarakis SE, Cavalli-Sforza LL, Temtamy S, Romeo G, Ten Kate LP, et al. Consanguineous marriages, pearls and perils: Geneva international consanguinity workshop report. Genetics in Medicine. 2011 Sep; 13(9): 841-7. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e318217477f. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/GIM.0b013e318217477f

Ullah S. Ocular Syndrome and their Systemic Association. Spectacular Journal. 2021 Mar; 2(3): 068-93.

Arooj M and Riaz R. Frequency of ocular diseases in patients visiting university of Lahore Teaching Hospital. Innovators in Medical & Health Sciences. 2021 Dec; 1(1): 1-7.

Ahmad S, Riaz R, Haseeb M, Rasheed HA, Iqbal S. Mean difference of visual acuity with auto refraction and subjective refraction. Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology. 2020 Feb; 36(1): 1-. doi: 10.36351/pjo. v36i1.909. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36351/pjo.v36i1.909

Seet B, Wong TY, Tan DT, Saw SM, Balakrishnan V, Lee LK, et al. Myopia in Singapore: taking a public health approach. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2001 May; 85(5): 521-6. doi: 10.1136/bjo.85.5.521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.85.5.521

Iqbal S, Shafiq M, Zeeshan M, Jamshed HA. Type of Horizontal Deviation in Consanguinity. Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology. 2018 Jun; 34(2): 1-.

Flores-Moreno I, Lugo F, Duker JS, Ruiz-Moreno JM. The relationship between axial length and choroidal thickness in eyes with high myopia. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2013 Feb; 155(2): 314-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.07.015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2012.07.015

Azam M, Iqbal S, Jamshed M, Nadeem HA. Association of different refractive error in parental cousin marriages. Ophthalmology Pakistan. 2016 Jul; 6(03): 19-22.

Lashari MH, Ayub R, Akhtar MS, Ayaz M, Tasawar Z. Correlates of myopia in students of Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan. JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association. 2017 Dec; 67(12): 1920-2.

Relhan N, Jalali S, Pehre N, Rao HL, Manusani U, Bodduluri L. High-hyperopia database, part I: clinical characterisation including morphometric (biometric) differentiation of posterior microphthalmos from nanophthalmos. Eye. 2016 Jan; 30(1): 120-6. doi: 10.1038/eye.2015.206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2015.206

Iqbal F, Khalil I, Khalil HA, Sadiq M, Noor HA, Zahid M. Frequency of low vision patient and their causes presenting in Madinah Teaching Hospital, Pakistan. Advances in Ophthalmology and Visual System. 2019; 9(6): 151-4. doi: 10.15406/aovs.2019.09.00368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15406/aovs.2019.09.00368

Akkaya S. Rate of parental consanguineous marriage among patients with visual impairments in Turkey. Medical Hypothesis, Discovery and Innovation in Ophthalmology. 2016 Dec; 5(4): 115.

Warsy AS, Al-Jaser MH, Albdass A, Al-Daihan S, Alanazi M. Is consanguinity prevalence decreasing in Saudis?: A study in two generations. African health sciences. 2014 Jun; 14(2): 314-21. doi: 10.4314/ahs. v14i2.5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v14i2.5

Downloads

Published

2023-05-31
CITATION
DOI: 10.54393/pjhs.v4i05.537
Published: 2023-05-31

How to Cite

Awais, A. ., Akram, S. ., Awais, D. ., Arshad, A. ., & Hassan, Z. . (2023). Association of Different Type of Refractive Errors with Parental Cousin Marriages: Refractive Errors with Parental Cousin Marriages. Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences, 4(05), 239–242. https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v4i05.537

Issue

Section

Original Article

Plaudit

Most read articles by the same author(s)