Frequency of Cystic Duct Anatomical Variations on ERCP- A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study
Frequency of Cystic Duct Anatomical Variations on ERCP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v7i8.2831Keywords:
Common Bile Duct, Cystic Duct, Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatogram, Anatomical VariationsAbstract
Cystic duct (CD) anatomical variations are common, but they frequently go unrecognized. Their prevalence differs among different studies. A proper understanding of these variations is important before performing any percutaneous, surgical, or endoscopic interventions to avoid complications. Objectives: To evaluate the frequency of anatomical variations of cystic duct insertion observed on endoscopic retrograde cholangiograms. Methods: A total of 500 cholangiograms (2020-2022) fulfilling the inclusion criteria were analyzed retrospectively for various CD insertion patterns from the Endoscopy suite of Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, after approval from the IRB. Patient information, including age, gender, and indication of ERCP were also recorded. Data were processed on SPSS v.25. Results of continuous measurements were expressed as mean ± SD (min, max), and results of categorical measurements were presented as number (%). Results: Among 500, there were 45% male and 55% female. Normal cystic duct mid-lateral insertion was seen in 62.2% of patients, while 37.8% showed anatomical variations. Among these variations, the most frequent one was low medial (15.4%), followed by middle medial (8.6%) and high lateral (7%). Conclusions: The study identified a high frequency of CD variations, thus highlighting the importance of imaging for the identification of these variations before performing any surgical or endoscopic procedures.
References
Zhu JH, Zhao SL, Kang Q, Zhu Y, Liu LX, Zou H. Classification of Anatomical Morphology of Cystic Duct and its Association with Gallstone. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2024 Feb; 16(2): 307. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i2.307.
Ekwesianya AC, Ayantunde BO, Ayantunde AA. A Cautionary Tale of Anatomical Variations of The Extrahepatic Biliary System and Their Implications for Surgical Procedures: A Systematic Literature Review. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 2025 May; 47(1): 145. doi: 10.1007/s00276-025-03660-6.
Priya A, Ghosh SK, Walocha JA, Pasternak A, Iwanaga J, Loukas M. Variations in Extra-Hepatic Biliary Tree Morphology and Morphometry: A Narrative Review of Literature with Focus on Cystohepatic Triangle. Folia Morphologica. 2023; 82(3): 498-506. doi: 10.5603/FM.a2022.0069.
Agarwal S, Choudhury PR, Biswas KK, Baruah P, Baro A. Anatomical Variations of Cystic Ducts in Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography: A Retrospective Study With 265 Patients. International Journal of Anatomy and Research. 2022; 10(3): 8391-8397. doi: 10.16965/ijar.2022.160.
Facciorusso A, Crinò SF, Gkolfakis P, Spadaccini M, Arvanitakis M, Beyna T et al. Diagnostic Work-Up of Bile Duct Strictures: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Guideline. Endoscopy. 2025 Feb; 57(02): 166-185. doi: 10.1055/a-2481-7048.
Wang W, Li J, Hu C, Zhang Z, Xu Y, Chu Y et al. A Single Center Study of Efficacy and Safety Assessment of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Guideline in Elderly Patients. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 2025 Jul; 11(221): 68166. doi: 10.3791/68166.
Taghavi A, Azizi M, Rasekhi A, Gholami Z. Anatomic Variations of the Cystic Duct in Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Shiraz: A Cross-Sectional Study. Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2022 Jan; 47(1): 48. doi:10.30476/IJMS.2021.88447.1918.
Gündüz N, Doğan MB, Alacagöz M, Yağbasan M, Orhan Söylemez UP, Atalay B. Anatomical Variations of Cystic Duct Insertion and Their Relationship with Choledocholithiasis: A Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography Study. Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2021 Aug; 52(1): 202. doi: 10.1186/s43055-021-00579-x.
Khan AS, Paracha SA, Shah Z, Tahir M, Wahab K. Anatomical Variations of Cystic Duct Encountered During Open Cholecystectomy. Khyber Medical University Journal. 2012 Mar; 4(1): 19-22.
Önder H, Özdemir MS, Tekbaş G, Ekici F, Gümüş H, Bilici A. 3-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Biliary Tract Variations. Surgical and radiologic anatomy. 2013 Mar; 35(2): 161-167. doi: 10.1007/s00276-012-1021-0.
Aljiffry M, Abbas M, Wazzan MA, Abduljabbar AH, Aloufi S, Aljahdli E. Biliary Anatomy and Pancreatic Duct Variations: A Cross-Sectional Study. Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology. 2020 Jul 1; 26(4): 188-193. doi: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_573_19.
Yason K, Gonza KG, Michael O, William B, Munabi I, Michael K. Anatomical Variations of the Gallbladder and Bile Ducts: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. International Journal of Hepatology. 2024; 2024(1): 3877814. doi: 10.1155/2024/3877814.
Lopes Vendrami C, Thorson DL, Borhani AA, Mittal PK, Hammond NA, Escobar DJ et al. Imaging of Biliary Tree Abnormalities. Radiographics. 2024 Jul; 44(8): 230174. doi: 10.1148/rg.230174.
Taştemur Y. Anatomical Variations of the Cystic Duct in Turkish Population and their Association with Biliary Tract Stone. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan. 2020 Oct; 30(10): 1005-1008. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2020.10.1005.
Sudeep KC, Banjade UR, Ghimire P. Anatomical Variations of the Cystic Duct Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography: A Cross-Sectional Study at a Tertiary Center of Nepal. Journal of Patan Academy of Health Sciences. 2024 Jun; 11(1): 15-20. doi: 10.3126/jpahs.v11i1.65646.
Muazzam MA, Hussain SM, Quraishi MT. Anatomical Variations of the Extrahepatic Biliary System in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in the Combined Military Hospital and Pak Emirates Military Hospital, Rawalpindi. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal. 2021 Jun; 30(3): 916. doi: 10.51253/pafmj.v71i3.3305.
Shanmugam S, Subbiah K, Thiagarajan S. Morphological Variations of the Cystic Duct and its Clinical Significance: A Cadaveric Study. National Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 2021 Jul; 10(3): 155-159. doi: 10.4103/NJCA.NJCA_69_21.
Swain B, Sahoo RK, Sen KK, Kumar M, Parihar SS, Dubey R. Evaluation of Intrahepatic and Extrahepatic Biliary Tree Anatomy and its Variation by Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Odisha Population: A Retrospective Study. Anatomy and Cell Biology. 2019 Mar; 53(1): 8. doi: 10.5115/acb.19.177.
Choi SJ, Yoon JH, Koh DH, Lee HL, Jun DW, Choi HS. Low Insertion of Cystic Duct Increases Risk for Common Bile Duct Stone Recurrence. Surgical Endoscopy. 2022 May; 36(5): 2786-2792. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08563-2.
Sherifi F, Bajraktari I, Bexheti S, Lahu A, Gashi Z, Shatri J. Anatomic Variations of the Cystic Duct Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography. Italian Journal of Anatomy and Embryology. 2018 Nov; 123(2): 158-164. doi: 10.13128/IJAE-24165.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access journal and all the published articles / items are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. For comments



