Lateral Cephalometric Analysis of Nasal Morphology in Patients Visiting Nishtar Institute of Dentistry

Lateral Cephalometric Analysis of Nasal Morphology

Authors

  • Sameera Jamshed Department of Orthodontics, Nishtar Institute of Dentistry, Multan, Pakistan
  • Zubair Hassan Awaisi Department of Orthodontics, Nishtar Institute of Dentistry, Multan, Pakistan
  • Zubair Ahmed Department of Orthodontics, Nishtar Institute of Dentistry, Multan, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v4i05.274

Keywords:

Nasal morphology, Lateral cephalometry, Nose profile,, Soft tissue morphology, Skeletal class 2

Abstract

Nasal morphology is the keystone of facial aesthetics. Being the most prominent part of the face, the shape and position of the nose greatly influence the facial profile and nasal soft tissue thickness also plays a vital role in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Objective: To evaluate the soft tissue nasal morphology in individuals presenting with different skeletal patterns such as skeletal class 1 and skeletal class 2 jaw relationship. Methods: It was Comparative Cross-sectional study conducted in Orthodontics Department of Nishtar Institute of Dentistry for the period of six months (5th Mar 2020 to 6th Jun 2021).  Study sample consisted of Lateral cephalometric radiographs of 65 subjects. Age range of sampled subjects was 19-26 years (mean age 20.93). The sample was divided into two groups on basis of the Skeletal jaw relationship as class-1 and class-2. An Independent t-test was applied for evaluation of the difference in lateral nasal morphology between both groups. Results:  Notable differences were found between skeletal class 1 and skeletal class 2 groups for the prominence of the mandible and Linear distance between soft tissue Pogonion and Pronasale. Considerable differences in measurements of nasal depth, nasofrontal angle, nasal tip projection angle, nasofacial angle and nasomental angle were found. Conclusions: It is concluded that nasal morphology was greatly influenced by not only the underlying skeletal jaw relationship yet other factors e.g., dentition along with soft tissue thickness were also responsible for nasal morphology differences among various skeletal patterns. Gender dimorphism also exists for various nasal features.

References

Arshad T, Shaikh A, Fida M. Comparison of nasal profiles in various skeletal patterns. Journal of Ayub Medical College Abbottabad. 2013 Jan; 25(1-2): 31-5.

ALBarakati SF and Bindayel NA. Holdaway soft tissue cephalometric standards for Saudi adults. King Saud University Journal of Dental Sciences. 2012 Jan; 3(1): 27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ksujds.2011.10.004.

Angle EH. Treatment of malocclusion of the teeth: Angle's system. SS White dental manufacturing Company. 7th Ed. S.S. 1907.

Hellman M. Some facial features and their orthodontic implication. American Journal of Orthodontics and Oral Surgery. 1939 Oct; 25(10): 927-51. doi: 10.1016/S0096-6347(39)90386-8.

Thakur G, Singla A, Jaj HS, Mahajan V, Negi P, Justa A. To evaluate relationship between craniofacial structures and nose in Himachali ethnic population. Indian Journal of Dental Sciences. 2016 Oct; 8(4): 193. doi: 10.4103/0976-4003.196815.

Subtelny JD. A longitudinal study of soft tissue facial structures and their profile characteristics, defined in relation to underlying skeletal structures. American Journal of Orthodontics. 1959 Jul; 45(7): 481-507. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(59)90014-4.

Aljabaa AH. Lateral cephalometric analysis of the nasal morphology among Saudi adults. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry. 2019; 11: 9. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S190230.

Oladipo GS, Olabiyi AO, Oremosu AA, Noronha CC. Nasal indices among major ethnic groups in southern Nigeria. Science Research and Essays. 2007 Jan; 2(1): 20-2.

Fernández‐Riveiro P, Smyth‐Chamosa E, Suárez‐Quintanilla D, Suárez‐Cunqueiro M. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 2003 Aug; 25(4): 393-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/25.4.393.

Celebi AA, Tan E, Gelgor IE, Colak T, Ayyildiz E. Comparison of soft tissue cephalometric norms between Turkish and European-American adults. The scientific world Journal. 2013 Jan; 2013: 806203. doi: 10.1155/2013/806203.

Begg RJ and Harkness M. A lateral cephalometric analysis of the adult nose. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 1995 Nov; 53(11): 1268-74. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(95)90582-0.

Legan HL and Burstone CJ. Soft tissue cephalometric analysis for orthognathic surgery. Journal of Oral Surgery (American Dental Association: 1965). 1980 Oct; 38(10): 744-51.

Mansour S, Burstone C, Legan H. An evaluation of soft-tissue changes resulting from Le Fort I maxillary surgery. American Journal of Orthodontics. 1983 Jul; 84(1): 37-47. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(83)90146-X.

Burstone CJ, James RB, Legan H, Murphy GA, Norton LA. Cephalometrics for orthognathic surgery. Journal of Oral Surgery (American Dental Association: 1965). 1978 Apr; 36(4): 269-77.

Amini F, Razavian ZS, Rakhshan V. Soft tissue cephalometric norms of Iranian class I adults with good occlusions and balanced faces. International Orthodontics. 2016 Mar; 14(1): 108-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2015.12.003.

Anić-Milošević S, Meštrović S, Lapter-Varga M, Dumančić J, Šlaj M. Analysis of the soft tissue profile in Croatians with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 2011 Jun; 33(3): 305-10. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq072

Genecov JS, Sinclair PM, Dechow PC. Development of the nose and soft tissue profile. The Angle Orthodontist. 1990 Sep; 60(3): 191-8.

Bhardwaj A, Maurya R, Nehra K, Mitra R, Kamat U, Nakra O. Comparative evaluation of various nasal parameters in different malocclusion and growth patterns: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society. 2018 Oct; 52(4): 243-7. doi: 0.4103/jios.jios_24_18.

Gulsen A, Okay C, Aslan BI, Uner O, Yavuzer R. The relationship between craniofacial structures and the nose in Anatolian Turkish adults: A cephalometric evaluation. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2006 Aug; 130(2): 131-e15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.020.

Enlow DH and Hans MG. Essentials of facial growth. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders. 1996.

Jafarpour F, Estomaguio GA, Vahid Dastjerdi E. Nasal morphology in Filipino samples with class I, II, and III jaw skeletal relationships. Iranian Journal of Orthodontics. 2014 Dec; 9(3): 1-3. doi: 10.17795/ijo-3744.

Basciftci FA, Uysal T, Buyukerkmen A. Craniofacial structure of Anatolian Turkish adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2004 Mar; 125(3): 366-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.04.004.

Fernandes TM, Pinzan A, Sathler R, Freitas MR, Janson G, Vieira FP. Comparative study of the soft tissue of young Japanese-Brazilian, Caucasian and Mongoloid patients. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. 2013 Apr; 18: 116-24. doi: 10.1590/S2176-94512013000200023.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-31
CITATION
DOI: 10.54393/pjhs.v4i05.274
Published: 2023-05-31

How to Cite

Jamshed , S. ., Zubair Hassan Awaisi, & Ahmed, Z. . (2023). Lateral Cephalometric Analysis of Nasal Morphology in Patients Visiting Nishtar Institute of Dentistry: Lateral Cephalometric Analysis of Nasal Morphology. Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences, 4(05), 84–89. https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v4i05.274

Issue

Section

Original Article

Plaudit