Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound for Benign and Malignant Hepatic Masses Taking Computed Tomography as Gold Standard

Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound for as Gold Standard

Authors

  • Ariba Aslam University Institute of Radiological Sciences & Medical Imaging Technology, The University of Lahore, Pakistan
  • Memona Nazir University Institute of Radiological Sciences & Medical Imaging Technology, The University of Lahore, Pakistan
  • Syed Zain ul Abidin University Institute of Radiological Sciences & Medical Imaging Technology, The University of Lahore, Pakistan
  • Zareen Fatima University Institute of Radiological Sciences & Medical Imaging Technology, The University of Lahore, Pakistan
  • Syed Muhammad Yousaf Farooq University Institute of Radiological Sciences & Medical Imaging Technology, The University of Lahore, Pakistan
  • Saad Zia University Institute of Radiological Sciences & Medical Imaging Technology, The University of Lahore, Pakistan
  • Waqar Ahmad University Institute of Radiological Sciences & Medical Imaging Technology, The University of Lahore, Pakistan
  • Nadia Adrees University Institute of Radiological Sciences & Medical Imaging Technology, The University of Lahore, Pakistan
  • Savaira Naeem University Institute of Radiological Sciences & Medical Imaging Technology, The University of Lahore, Pakistan
  • Areej Imtiaz University Institute of Radiological Sciences & Medical Imaging Technology, The University of Lahore, Pakistan
  • Manahil Fatima University Institute of Radiological Sciences & Medical Imaging Technology, The University of Lahore, Pakistan
  • Ujala Rita University Institute of Radiological Sciences & Medical Imaging Technology, The University of Lahore, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v3i06.269

Keywords:

Diagnostic accuracy, CT-Scan, Malignant, Liver Mass

Abstract

Detection of benign and malignant liver masses is very important for the treatment. Objectives: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for hepatic masses taking computed tomography as gold standard Methods: It was cross a sectional analytical study to.it involves 266 patients suffering from hepatocellular cell carcinoma age group 45 to 65 years visiting Department of Radiology THQ Hospital Hazro, both genders were included. Consecutive sampling method was used. The collection of data was done through questionnaire and analysis by using SPSS version 25. Results: This study enlisted the participation of 261 patients. The average age of all patients was 59.28 14 years, with a range of 45 to 65 years. It describes that the total number of true positive disease were 228 which was also detected on ultrasound. However, the occurrence of HCC is highest on CT scan when compared with adenoma and hemangioma. There were 28 patients with multiple lesions, with 71.4 % being malignant and 28.6 % being benign. On the other hand, 22 individuals had a single lesion, of which 36.4% were malignant and 63.6 % were benign (p 0.001). CT had a sensitivity of 96 % to diagnose a malignant lesion, a specificity of 88.4 %, an accuracy of 95.78 %, a positive predictive value of 98.70 %, and a negative predictive value of 73.33 %. Conclusions:  The results of the present study therefore  concluded that CT is a useful  modality for the diagnosis of malignant liver masses.Ultrasound had high sensitivity, specificity for the hepatic masses. females were more effected than males. Among hepatic masses, HCC is the commonest.

References

Giannitrapani L, Soresi M, La Spada E, Cervello M, D'alessandro N, Montalto G. Sex hormones and risk of liver tumor. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2006 Nov; 1089(1):228-36. doi: 10.1196/annals.1386.044

Dogliotti E. Molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis by vinyl chloride. ANNALI-ISTITUTO SUPERIORE DI SANITA. 2006 Jan; 42(2):163.

Shaib Y and El-Serag HB. The epidemiology of cholangiocarcinoma. InSeminars in liver disease 2004 May (Vol. 24, No. 02, pp. 115-125). Copyright© 2004 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-828889

Coakley FV and Schwartz LH. Imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: a practical approach. InSeminars in oncology 2001 Oct 1 (Vol. 28, No. 5, pp. 460-473). WB Saunders. doi: 10.1016/S0093-7754(01)90139-3

Hussain SM and Semelka RC. Liver masses. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics 2005; 13(2):255-75.

Yamashita Y, Ogata I, Urata J, Takahashi M. Cavernous hemangioma of the liver: pathologic correlation with dynamic CT findings. Radiology. 1997 Apr; 203(1):121-5. doi: 10.1148/radiology.203.1.9122378

Lizardi-Cervera J, Cuéllar-Gamboa L, Motola-Kuba D. Focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatic adenoma: a review. Annals of Hepatology. 2006; 5(3):206-11. doi: 10.1016/s1665-2681(19)32013-7

Tsao JI, DeSanctis J, Rossi RL, Oberfield RA. Hepatic malignancies. Surgical Clinics of North America 2000 Apr; 80(2):603-32. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70203-6

Lim J and Park C. Pathology of cholangiocarcinoma. Abdominal imaging 2004 Sep; 29(5):540-7. doi: 10.1007/s00261-004-0187-2

Kim KW, Kim TK, Han JK, Kim AY, Lee HJ, Park SH, et al., Hepatic hemangiomas: spectrum of US appearances on gray-scale, power Doppler, and contrast-enhanced US. Korean journal of radiology. 2000 Dec; 1(4):191-7. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2000.1.4.191

Borhani AA, Wiant A, Heller MT. Cystic hepatic lesions: a review and an algorithmic approach. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2014 Dec; 203(6):1192-204. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.12386

Pitchaimuthu M and Duxbury M. Cystic lesions of the liver-A review. Current problems in surgery. 2017 Oct; 54(10):514-42. doi: 10.1067/j.cpsurg.2017.09.001

Noone TC, Semelka RC, Balci NC, Graham ML. Common occurrence of benign liver lesions in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer investigated by MRI for suspected liver metastases. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Official Journal of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 1999 Aug; 10(2):165-9. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199908)10:2%3C165::AID-JMRI9%3E3.0.CO;2-Z

Valls C, Iannacconne R, Alba E, Murakami T, Hori M, Passariello R, et al., Fat in the liver: diagnosis and characterization. European radiology 2006; 16(10):2292-308. doi: 10.1007/s00330-006-0146-0

Jones EC, Chezmar JL, Nelson RC, Bernardino ME. The frequency and significance of small (less than or equal to 15 mm) hepatic lesions detected by CT. AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 1992 Mar; 158(3):535-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.158.3.1738990

Schwartz LH, Gandras EJ, Colangelo SM, Ercolani MC, Panicek DM. Prevalence and importance of small hepatic lesions found at CT in patients with cancer. Radiology. 1999 Jan; 210(1):71-4. doi: 10.1148/radiology.210.1.r99ja0371

Kang BK, Lim JH, Kim SH, Choi D, Lim HK, Lee WJ, et al., Preoperative depiction of hepatocellular carcinoma: ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging versus triple-phase helical CT. Radiology. 2003 Jan; 226(1):79-85. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2261011827

Snow Jr JH, Goldstein HM, Wallace S. Comparison of scintigraphy, sonography, and computed tomography in the evaluation of hepatic neoplasms. American Journal of Roentgenology. 1979 Jun; 132(6):915-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.132.6.915

Parveen S. Role of Ultrasound and CT in the Evaluation of Space Occupying Lesions in Liver Prospective Study with Histopathological Correlation. MD Thesis, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka. 2000.

Marchuk DA. Pathogenesis of hemangioma. The journal of clinical Investigation. 2001 Mar 15 ;107(6):665-6. doi: 10.1172/JCI12470

Downloads

Published

2022-11-30
CITATION
DOI: 10.54393/pjhs.v3i06.269
Published: 2022-11-30

How to Cite

Aslam, A. ., Nazir, M., Zain ul Abidin, S. ., Fatima, Z. ., Yousaf Farooq, S. M. ., Zia, S. ., Ahmad, W. ., Adrees, N. ., Naeem, S. ., Imtiaz, A., Fatima, M. ., & Rita, U. . (2022). Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound for Benign and Malignant Hepatic Masses Taking Computed Tomography as Gold Standard: Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound for as Gold Standard . Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences, 3(06), 59–63. https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v3i06.269

Issue

Section

Original Article

Plaudit

Most read articles by the same author(s)