Determination of Diagnostic Accuracy of ACR-TI-RADS in Detecting Malignancy in Thyroid Nodules On Ultrasonography, Keeping Bethesda Cytological Score at FNAC as Gold Standard

ACR-TI-RADS in Detecting Malignancy in Thyroid Nodules, Bethesda Cytological Score

Authors

  • Touseef Bilal Khan Department of ENT, Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Tarique Ali Shaikh Department of ENT, Sharif Medical and Dental College, Sharif Medical City Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Sajjad Akram Department of ENT, Jinnah Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Ramzan Ali Department of Pediatric ENT, University of Child Health Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Werdah Zia Department of ENT, Arif Memorial Teaching Hospital, Rashid Latif Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Tarique Khan Department of ENT, Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Sania Maqbool Department of Physical Therapy, Lahore College for Women University, Lahore, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v6i3.2685

Keywords:

Thyroid Nodules, ACR TI-RADS, Bethesda System, Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology

Abstract

Thyroid nodules are a common clinical concern, requiring precise evaluation to differentiate benign from malignant cases. Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of the ACR TI-RADS with the Bethesda System, the gold standard for thyroid cytopathology. Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out within the Diagnostic Radiology Division of Mayo Hospital Lahore between August and November 2024, and included 224 patients who had thyroid nodules on ultrasonography and were planned for fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). A radiologist assessed the ACR-TIRADS scores after data were accumulated employing a standardized case report form. The FNACs were categorized utilizing the Bethesda framework. SPSS version 29.0 was used to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of the ACR TI-RADS system. Results: Their study had a total of 224 patients, with a prevalence of female (186, 83.0%). The sensitivity of ACR TI-RADS in identifying malignant nodules was 87.5% (SE=0.049, 95% CI (77.9%, 97.1%)), while specificity was lower at 31.6% (SE=0.039, 95% CI (23.9%, 39.3%)). The PPV and NPV were 33.6% and 86.5%, respectively. Overall, the accuracy of ACR TI-RADS was 47.4%. Conclusions: It was concluded that the ACR TI-RADS system showed excellent sensitivity but low specificity in identifying malignant thyroid nodules. This implies that ACR TI-RADS is more useful for excluding cancer than identifying malignant instances. To improve the ACR TI-RADS system's predictability across a range of populations, more research is required.

References

Dean DS and Gharib H. Epidemiology of Thyroid Nodules. Best Practice and Research Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2008 Dec; 22(6): 901-11. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2008.09.019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2008.09.019

Alexander EK, Doherty GM, Barletta JA. Management of Thyroid Nodules. The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology. 2022 Jul; 10(7): 540-8. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00139-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00139-5

Isse HM, Lukande R, Sereke SG, Odubu FJ, Nassanga R, Bugeza S. Correlation of the Ultrasound Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System with Cytology Findings Among Patients in Uganda. Thyroid Research. 2023 Sep;1 6(1): 26. doi: 10.1186/s13044-023-00169-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13044-023-00169-1

Joseph-Auguste J, Lin L, Demar M, Duffas O, Molinie V, Sulpicy C et al. Epidemiologic, Clinical, Ultrasonographic, and Cytological Features of Thyroid Nodules In Predicting Malignancy Risk: A Retrospective Study of 442 French Afro‐Caribbean Patients. International Journal of Endocrinology. 2020; 2020(1): 4039290. doi: 10.1155/2020/4039290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4039290

Lin B, Ma H, Ma M, Zhang Z, Sun Z, Hsieh IY et al. The Incidence and Survival Analysis for Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer: A SEER Database Analysis. American Journal of Translational Research. 2019 Sep; 11(9): 5888.

Bailey S and Wallwork B. Differentiating Between Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules:' An Evidence-Based Approach in General Practice'. Australian Journal of General Practice. 2018 Nov; 47(11): 770-4. doi: 10.31128/AJGP-03-18-4518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-03-18-4518

Tessler FN, Middleton WD, Grant EG, Hoang JK, Berland LL, Teefey SA et al. ACR Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS): White Paper of The ACR TI-RADS Committee. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2017 May; 14(5): 587-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.01.046. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.01.046

Azab EA, Abdelrahman AS, Ibrahim ME. A Practical Trial to Use Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) in Differentiation Between Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules. Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2019 Dec; 50: 1-8. doi: 10.1186/s43055-019-0020-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-019-0020-0

Alshaikh S, Harb Z, Aljufairi E, Almahari SA. Classification of Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology into Bethesda Categories: An Institutional Experience and Review of the Literature. Cytojournal. 2018 Feb; 15: 4. doi: 10.4103/cytojournal.cytojournal_32_17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/cytojournal.cytojournal_32_17

Liu X, Medici M, Kwong N, Angell TE, Marqusee E, Kim MI et al. Bethesda Categorization of Thyroid Nodule Cytology and Prediction of Thyroid Cancer Type and Prognosis. Thyroid. 2016 Feb; 26(2): 256-61. doi: 10.1089/thy.2015.0376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2015.0376

Reuters KB, Mamone MC, Ikejiri ES, Camacho CP, Nakabashi CC, Janovsky CC et al. Bethesda Classification and Cytohistological Correlation of Thyroid Nodules in A Brazilian Thyroid Disease Center. European Thyroid Journal. 2018 Jun; 7(3): 133-8. doi: 10.1159/000488104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000488104

Ullah I, Asif M, Alam N, Ali S, Haq IU, Khan I. Study on the Prevalence of Goiter and Associated Factors Among Hospitalized Patients of District Timergara, Dir Lower Pakistan. Biomedical Journal of Scientific and Technical Research. 2022; 41(2): 32458-63. doi: 10.26717/BJSTR.2022.41.006563. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26717/BJSTR.2022.41.006563

Barbosa TL, Junior CO, Graf H, Cavalvanti T, Trippia MA, da Silveira Ugino RT et al. ACR TI-RADS and ATA US Scores Are Helpful for the Management of Thyroid Nodules with Indeterminate Cytology. BioMed Central Endocrine Disorders. 2019 Dec; 19: 1-1. doi: 10.1186/s12902-019-0429-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-019-0429-5

Giles WH, Maclellan RA, Gawande AA, Ruan DT, Alexander EK, Moore FD et al. False Negative Cytology in Large Thyroid Nodules. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2015 Jan; 22: 152-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3952-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3952-7

AlSaedi AH, Almalki DS, ElKady RM, ElKady R. Approach to Thyroid Nodules: Diagnosis and Treatment. Cureus. 2024 Jan; 16(1). doi: 10.7759/cureus.52232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.52232

Singaporewalla RM, Hwee J, Lang TU, Desai V. Clinico-Pathological Correlation of Thyroid Nodule Ultrasound and Cytology Using the TIRADS and Bethesda Classifications. World Journal of Surgery. 2017 Jul; 41: 1807-11. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-3919-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-3919-5

George NA, Suresh S, Jiji V, Renu S, Thomas S, Janardhan D et al. Correlation of TIRADS and Bethesda Scoring Systems with Final Histopathology of Thyroid Nodules–An Institutional Experience. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery. 2021 Jan: 1-6. doi: 10.1007/s12070-021-02380-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-021-02380-8

Alshoabi SA and Binnuhaid AA. Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography Versus Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology for Predicting Benign Thyroid Lesions. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2019 May; 35(3): 630. doi: 10.12669/pjms.35.3.292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.35.3.292

Nighat S, Zahra M, Javed AM, Ahmad S, Anwar S, Kamal UH. Diagnostic Accuracy of TI-RADS Classification in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules Study from Southern Punjab, Pakistan. Biomedica. 2021 Sep; 37(3). doi: 10.51441/BioMedica/5-504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51441/BioMedica/5-504

Orhan Soylemez UP, Gunduz N. Diagnostic Accuracy of Five Different Classification Systems for Thyroid Nodules: A Prospective, Comparative Study. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2022 May; 41(5): 1125-36. doi: 10.1002/jum.15802. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.15802

Downloads

Published

2025-03-31
CITATION
DOI: 10.54393/pjhs.v6i3.2685
Published: 2025-03-31

How to Cite

Khan, T. B., Shaikh, T. A., Akram, S., Ali, R., Zia, W., Khan, T., & Maqbool, S. (2025). Determination of Diagnostic Accuracy of ACR-TI-RADS in Detecting Malignancy in Thyroid Nodules On Ultrasonography, Keeping Bethesda Cytological Score at FNAC as Gold Standard: ACR-TI-RADS in Detecting Malignancy in Thyroid Nodules, Bethesda Cytological Score . Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences, 6(3), 291–295. https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v6i3.2685

Issue

Section

Original Article

Plaudit