Comparison Of Operative Outcomes of Open Versus Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for the Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
Operative Outcomes of Open vs Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v7i5.3662Keywords:
Lumbar Spondylolisthesis, Pedicle Screw Fixation, Percutaneous Transpedicular Screw Fixation, OutcomesAbstract
Lumbar spondylolisthesis often requires surgical correction, with options like open or percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. Objectives: To compare their outcomes, focusing on reduced trauma, blood loss, and postoperative pain with the percutaneous approach. Methods: A quasi-experimental trial at Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Lahore, included 44 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis. Exclusion criteria were metabolic bone diseases, prior spine surgery, pregnancy, and spinal malignancy. Patients were divided into Group A (percutaneous fixation) and Group B (open Pedicle screw fixation). Intraoperative time, blood loss, and VAS pain scores were recorded. The outcome variables were postoperative hospital stay, blood loss, and surgery duration. Data was analyzed by using SPSS 25.0. Results: Among 44 participants, 20 were male, and 24 were female. Group A had 6 males (27.3%) and 16 females (72.7%), while Group B had 14 males (63.6%) and 8 females (36.4%). Mean intraoperative time was 44.45 ± 6.87 minutes in Group A vs. 51.27 ± 3.45 in Group B. Blood loss was significantly lower in Group A (52.82 ± 3.45 mL) compared to Group B (349.23 ± 92 mL, p<0.05). Postoperative pain at 6 weeks (Group A: 3.09 ± 1.41 vs. Group B: 3.36 ± 1.59) and 3 months (Group A: 2.18 ± 1.09 vs. Group B: 2.0 ± 1.02), indicating no statistical difference. Conclusions: Compared with traditional posterior muscle stripping treatments, percutaneous pedicle screw fixation proves an effective treatment in terms of less postoperative blood loss and operative time. This highlights the technique’s potential advantages in improving patient recovery without compromising long-term pain outcomes.
References
Li N, Scofield J, Mangham P, Cooper J, Sherman W, Kaye AD. Spondylolisthesis. Orthopedic Reviews. 2022
Jul; 14(3): 36917. doi: 10.52965/001c.36917.
Deer T, Sayed D, Michels J, Josephson Y, Li S, Calodney AK. A Review of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Intermittent Neurogenic Claudication: Disease and Diagnosis. Pain Medicine. 2019 Dec; 20(2): 32-44. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz161.
Achar S and Yamanaka J. Back Pain in Children and Adolescents. American Family Physician. 2020 Jul; 102(1): 19-28.
Dimar JR, Nabizadeh N, Gauthier L, El-Hawary R. Early-Onset Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis: Diagnosis, Analysis of the Sagittal Plane, and Treatment Techniques. The Growing Spine: Management of Spinal Disorders in Young Children. 2022 Feb: 395-410. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-84393-9_24.
Serikyaku H, Higa S, Yara T. Differences in Preoperative Clinical Symptoms and Radiological Findings of Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis and Lumbar Canal Stenosis. Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery. 2023 Sep; 33: 101768. doi: 10.1016/j.inat.2023.101768.
Aoki Y, Takahashi H, Nakajima A, Kubota G, Watanabe A, Nakajima T et al. Prevalence of Lumbar Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis in Patients with Degenerative Spinal Disease. Scientific Reports. 2020 Apr; 10(1): 6739. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63784-0.
Rhajib MA, Islam MW, Hossain MA, Haque MO, Fazal AI. Evidence-Based Physiotherapy Intervention of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Narrative Review. Journal of Spine Research and Surgery. 2022; 4(2): 72-79.
Overgaard FG, Mau Brandt SL, Hansen A, Hestbæk L, Nim CG. Children and Adolescents Seen at a Medical Unit–A Retrospective Review of Patient Records from the Spine Center of Southern Denmark. International Journal of Healthcare Management. 2024 Oct; 17(4): 671-682. doi: 10.1080/20479700.2023.2225803.
García-Ramos CL, Valenzuela-González J, Baeza-Álvarez VB, Rosales-Olivarez LM, Alpizar-Aguirre A, Reyes-Sánchez A. Degenerative Spondylolisthesis I: General Principles. Acta Ortopédica Mexicana. 2020 Oct; 34(5): 324-328. doi: 10.35366/97997.
García-Ramos CL, Valenzuela-González J, Baeza-Álvarez VB, Rosales-Olivarez LM, Alpízar-Aguirre A, Reyes-Sánchez A. Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis II: Treatment and Controversies. Acta Ortopédica Mexicana. 2020 Dec; 34(6): 433-440. doi: 10.35366/99144.
Nedelea DG, Vulpe DE, Gherghiceanu F, Capitanu BS, Dragosloveanu S, Stoica IC. Surgical and Non-Surgical Management of Spondylolisthesis: A Comprehensive Review. Journal of Medicine and Life. 2025 Mar; 18(3): 196.
Orlando V, Galieri G, Mazzucchi E, Pignotti F, Carcagnì A, Bazzu P et al. Comparative Analysis of Pedicle Screw Fixation and Interspinous Devices in Lumbar Spinal Fusion: Clinical and Surgical Outcomes in Degenerative Spine Conditions. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2025 Feb; 15(3): 95. doi: 10.3390/jpm15030095.
Wang PT, Zhang JN, Liu TJ, Yang JS, Hao DJ. Comparison of Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis and Isthmic Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: Effect of Pedicle Screw Placement on Proximal Facet Invasion in Surgical Treatment. BioMed Center Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2022 Jan; 23(1): 6. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04962-7.
Gazzeri R, Panagiotopoulos K, Galarza M, Leoni ML, Agrillo U. Stand-Alone Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Lumbar Fixation to Indirectly Decompress the Neural Elements in Spinal Stenosis: A Radiographic Assessment Case Series. Journal of Neurological Surgery Part A: Central European Neurosurgery. 2025 Jan; 86(1): 38-47. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1777751.
Karamian BA, Conaway WK, Mao JZ, Canseco JA, Levy HA, Lee JK et al. Circumferential Fusion with Open Versus Percutaneous Posterior Fusion for Lumbar Isthmic Spondylolisthesis. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. 2021 Oct; 209: 106935. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106935.
Xiao L, Zhao Q, Sun X, Liu C, Zhang Y, Xu H. Relationship Between Alterations of Spinal/Pelvic Sagittal Parameters and Clinical Outcomes After Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion. World Neurosurgery. 2020 Jan; 133: 156-164. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.08.158.
Choovongkomol K, Piyapromdee U, Thepjung S, Tanaviriyachai T, Jongkittanakul S, Sudprasert W. Comparative Outcomes of Percutaneous and Conventional Open Pedicle Screw Fixation for Single-Level Thoracolumbar Spine Injury: Randomised Controlled Trial. Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal. 2024 Mar; 18(1): 106. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.2403.014.
Ishihara S, Funao H, Isogai N, Ishihara M, Saito T, Ishii K. Minimally Invasive Spine Stabilization for Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis: A 23-Case Series and Review of Literature. Medicina. 2022 Jun; 58(6): 754. doi: 10.3390/medicina58060754.
Hayoun T, Siboni R, Ohl X, Bredin S. Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures: Comparison of the Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Percutaneous Versus Open Surgery. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology. 2023 Aug; 33(6): 2393-2397. doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03444-3.
Luo M, Yang Y, Liu Z, Tan J, Luo J, Long Z et al. Percutaneous Versus Traditional Open Approaches for the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures in Patients Without Neurologic Deficits: a meta-analysis of 35 cohort studies. Neurosurgical Review. 2024 Jan; 47(1): 62. doi: 10.1007/s10143-023-02259-y.
Perna A, Smakaj A, Vitiello R, Velluto C, Proietti L, Tamburrelli FC et al. Posterior Percutaneous Pedicle Screws Fixation Versus Open Surgical Instrumented Fusion for Thoraco-Lumbar Spinal Metastases Palliative Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Oncology. 2022 Apr; 12: 884928. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.884928.
Tian F, Tu LY, Gu WF, Zhang EF, Wang ZB, Chu G et al. Percutaneous Versus Open Pedicle Screw Instrumentation in Treatment of Thoracic and Lumbar Spine Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicine. 2018 Oct; 97(41): 12535. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012535.
Phan K, Rao PJ, Mobbs RJ. Percutaneous Versus Open Pedicle Screw Fixation for Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. 2015 Aug; 135: 85-92. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.05.016.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access journal and all the published articles / items are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. For comments



