Feto-Maternal Outcomes of Labouring Patients in Booked and Unbooked Patients
Feto-Maternal Outcomes of Laboring Patients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v3i06.291Keywords:
Booking; Pregnancy Complications; Maternal Mortality; Maternal OutcomeAbstract
The main factor contributing to poor feto-maternal outcomes is lack of antenatal care and awareness among pregnant ladies for need of booking in hospitals for their delivery management. Up to 39% of all obstetric patients in underdeveloped countries are hospitalized due to complications of labor, and same is case with neonates. Objective: To determine the association between patient booking status and outcomes because high maternal morbidity and mortality rates are indicative of the poor state of health services. Methods: A total of 380 patients, 190 booked patients admitted in emergency and 190 unbooked patients with fetal and maternal problems were included. The demographic data of each patient were recorded to determine the fetomaternal outcomes. Results: Different causes of obstructed labour such as CPD (60.62%), malpresentation (17.98%), and malposition (23.34%) were recorded in patients. In booked patients, 9.47, 3.15, and 5.78% of wound infection, anaemia, and ruptured uterus were recorded, respectively, while 11.05, 4.73, and 6.84%, respectively in unbooked patients. Among booked patients, 80.52% had maternal complications while 95.26% of unbooked had complications. Fetomaternal is a disorder that can be avoided and is common in underdeveloped nations. The majority of patients were unscheduled patients who did not obtain adequate antenatal care and as a result, showed up late in advanced labour with obstructional symptoms. CPD was the most typical reason for labour obstruction. Conclusions: Puerperal pyrexia was the most frequent maternal consequence, followed by PPH and UTI. Birth asphyxia was the most frequent prenatal consequence, followed by neonatal infection.
References
Latif F, ayub R, Javaid K. Comparison of Feto-Maternal Complications in Booked and Unbooked Females Presenting at Time of Delivery in Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Lahore. Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences. 2014 Jul; 8(3): 595-9.
Rizvi SM, Gandotra N. Maternofetal outcome in obstructed labour in a tertiary care hospital. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2017; 4:1410-3. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20150720
Setia S, Maheshwari B. To study maternal complications in booked and unbooked cases. International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2020; 4(4): 89-93. doi: 10.33545/gynae.2020.v4.i4b.629
Akaba GO, Onafowokan O, Offiong RA, Omonua K, Ekele BA. Uterine rupture: trends and feto-maternal outcome in a Nigerian teaching hospital. Nigerian Journal of Medicine. 2013 Oct; 22(4):304-8.
Sinha A. Incidence, causes and feto-maternal outcomes of obstructed labour in a tertiary health care centre. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2017 Jul; 6(7):2817-22.
Bulsara NM, Bhatia SG. Study of Feto-Maternal Outcome of Pregnancy in Booked Versus Unbooked Patients. Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2019; 8500(8000):190. doi: 10.21088/ijog.2321.1636.7219.11
Naheed I, Malik SS, Akhtar M, Khatri N. An audit of increasing cesarean section rate in primigravidas. Diabetes. 2013;1:0-4.
Tabassum S, Shamsher S, Sadaf R, Rauf B, Begum I. Fetomaternal outcome of obstructed labour. Khyber Journal Of Medical Sciences. 2017 Sep;10(3):318.
Aftab S, Kazi S, Ahsan JA. Assessment of pregnancy outcome in booked and unbooked women. Medical Channel. 2012 Oct.
Ashraf-Ganjoei T, Mirzaei F, Anari-Dokht F. Relationship between prenatal care and the outcome of pregnancy in low-risk pregnancies Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2011 Sep; 1(3):109-2. doi:10.4236/ojog.2011.13019
Sahoo S, Somani SR, Somani S, Sree KG, Babu PS. Obstetric & perinatal morbidity & mortality in booked & unbooked antenatal Patients. Indian Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Research. 2015 Jun; 4(3):510-7.
Fabamwo A, Akinola D, Mojoyinola O. The Tragic consequences of unsupervised pregnancies among Patients referred to a Tertiary Maternity Unit in Lagos, south west Nigeria. The internet journal of tropical medicine. 2010;7(9):21-5.
Mundhra R, Singh AS, Agarwal M, Kumar R. Utilization of antenatal care and its influence on fetal-maternal outcome: a tertiary care experience. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2013 Dec 1;2(4):600-6.
Owolabi AT, Fatusi AO, Kuti O, Adeyemi A, Faturoti SO, Obiajuwa PO. Maternal complications and perinatal outcomes in booked and unbooked Nigerian mothers. Singapore medical journal. 2008 Jul; 49(7):526.
Subedi SS, Bhansakarya R, Sharma SK. Study of Maternal and Fetal Outcome among Booked and Unbooked Patients at tertiary Hospital. Birat Journal of Health Sciences. 2020 Sep; 5(2):1027-30. doi: 10.3126/bjhs.v5i2.31376
Tuladhar H, Dhakal N. Impact of antenatal care on maternal and perinatal utcome: a study at Nepal medical college teaching hospital. Nepal journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2011; 6(2):37-43. doi: 10.3126/njog.v6i2.6755
Mukherjee S, Bawa AK, Sharma S, Nandanwar YS, Gadam M. Retrospective study of risk factors and maternal and fetal outcome in patients with abruptio placentae. Journal of natural science, biology, and medicine. 2014 Jul; 5(2):425. doi: 10.4103/0976-9668.136217
Islam JA, Ara G, Choudhury FR. Risk Factors and Outcome of Obstructed Labour at a tertiary care Hospital. Journal of Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College. 2012;4(2):43-6. doi: 10.3329/jssmc.v4i2.14401
Sodje JD, Ande AA. Socio-demographic characteristics and pregnancy outcome of booked and unbooked women at the University of Teaching Hospital. Journal of Medicine and Biomedical Research. 2016;15(1):109-20.
Kongwattanakul K, Saksiriwuttho P, Chaiyarach S, Thepsuthammarat K. Incidence, characteristics, maternal complications, and perinatal outcomes associated with preeclampsia with severe features and HELLP syndrome. International journal of women's health. 2018;10:371.
Banik P, Devi RP, Sanaton A, Thounaojam A, Solo VE, Kumar P, Wann C. Fetomaternal Outcomes of Pregnancy with Multiple Repeat Caesarean Sections in a Tertiary Hospital in North-East India. Emergency, 32, 31-4.
Gonied AS. Maternal complications and perinatal outcomes in booked and unbooked mothers. J Am Sci. 2011; 7(10):792-6.
Vijayasree M. Comparative study of maternal and foetal outcome of labour in booked versus unbooked antenatal mothers in rural India. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2015; 14(4):55-61.
Sunita SP, Nacharaju M, Kaul R, Suchetha D. Maternal and fetal outcome in booked and unbooked patients undergoing emergency LSCS. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 2015; 4(42):7402-7409.
Subedi SS, Bhansakarya R, Sharma SK. Study of Maternal and Fetal Outcome among Booked and Unbooked Patients at tertiary Hospital. Birat Journal of Health Sciences. 2020; 5(2):1027-1030. doi: 10.3126/bjhs.v5i2.31376
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access journal and all the published articles / items are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. For comments
