Role of Anxiety Sensitivity, Intolerance of Uncertainty, and Cyberchondria Behaviors among Individuals Diagnosed with COVID-19 : Role of Anxiety Sensitivity and Cyberchondria Behaviors

Nudrat Rashid; Amna Shahid; Mehwish Munir; Muhammad Umar Khan; Zoobia Ramzan

doi:10.54393/pjhs.v4i12.1173

Authors

Nudrat Rashid Department of Applied Psychology, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan
Amna Shahid Department of Applied Psychology, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan
Mehwish Munir Department of Applied Psychology, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan
Muhammad Umar Khan Department of Applied Psychology, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan
Zoobia Ramzan Institute of Behavioral Sciences, Dow University of Health Sciences, Ojha Campus, Karachi, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v4i12.1173

Keywords:

Cyberchondria, Anxiety Sensitivity, COVID-19

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic was a quick outbreak that affected individuals’ mental health. Objective: To investigate the relationship between anxiety sensitivity, intolerance of uncertainty, and cyberchondria tendencies among individuals with and without COVID-19. Methods: A total of 411 COVID-19 individuals, including 185 men (45%) and 226 women (55%) from low, middle, and high socioeconomic statuses (103 men (25.1%), 155 men (37.7%), and 153 men (37.2%)) were recruited. The participants ranged in age from 18 to 30. Data were collected from different public sector hospitals and a public sector university of Faisalabad. We calculated the results through SPSS version 27. Results: The findings showed a significant positive association between cyberchondria tendencies and anxiety sensitivity (r = 0.61, p.001) and intolerance for uncertainty (r = 0.64, p.001). Moreover, significant differences were observed in the variable of anxiety sensitivity (t =-10.40, p.001), intolerance of uncertainty (t = -5.89, p.001), and cyberchondria tendency (t =-6.08, p.001) between individual diagnosed with and without COVID-19. Conclusions: It is concluded that there is a significant relationship of anxiety sensitivity and intolerance of uncertainty with cyberchondria tendencies and significant differences were found between gender and individuals diagnosed with and without COVID-19

References

Starcevic V and Berle D. Cyberchondria: towards a better understanding of excessive health-related Internet use. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics. 2013 Feb; 13(2): 205–13. doi: 10.1586/ern.12.162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1586/ern.12.162

McElroy E and Shevlin M. The development and initial validation of the cyberchondria severity scale (CSS). Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 2014 Mar; 28(2): 259–65. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.12.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.12.007

Thompson RR, Jones NM, Holman EA, Silver RC. Media exposure to mass violence events can fuel a cycle of distress. Science Advances. 2019 Apr; 5(4): eaav3502. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aav3502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav3502

Garfin DR, Silver RC, Holman EA. The novel coronavirus (COVID-2019) outbreak: Amplification of public health consequences by media exposure. Health Psychology. 2020; 39(5): 355–7. doi: 10.1037/hea0000875. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000875

Laato S, Islam AKMN, Islam MN, Whelan E. What drives unverified information sharing and cyberchondria during the COVID-19 pandemic? European Journal of Information Systems. 2020 May; 29(3): 288–305. doi: 10.1080/0960085X.2020.1770632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1770632

Abel T and McQueen D. The COVID-19 pandemic calls for spatial distancing and social closeness: not for social distancing! International Journal of Public Health. 2020 Apr; 65(3): 231–231. doi: 10.1007/s00038-020-01366-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-020-01366-7

Makarla S, Gopichandran V, Tondare D. Prevalence and correlates of cyberchondria among professionals working in the information technology sector in Chennai, India: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine. 2019 Apr; 65(2): 87–92.

Akhtar M and Fatima T. Exploring cyberchondria and worry about health among individuals with no diagnosed medical condition. Journal of Pakistan Medical Association. 2019; 70(3): 90-5. doi: 10.5455/JPMA.8682. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/JPMA.8682

Chang J, Yuan Y, Wang D. Mental health status and its influencing factors among college students during the epidemic of COVID-19. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2020; 171–6.

Jokic-Begic N, Korajlija AL, Mikac U. Cyberchondria in the age of COVID-19. PLoS One. 2020 Dec; 15(12): e0243704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243704. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243704

Bajcar B and Babiak J. Neuroticism and cyberchondria: The mediating role of intolerance of uncertainty and defensive pessimism. Personality and Individual Differences. 2020 Aug; 162: 110006. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110006

Lee SA. Coronavirus Anxiety Scale: A brief mental health screener for COVID-19 related anxiety. Death Studies. 2020 Jul; 44(7): 393–401. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2020.1748481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2020.1748481

Taylor S, Zvolensky MJ, Cox BJ, Deacon B, Heimberg RG, Ledley DR, et al. Robust dimensions of anxiety sensitivity: Development and initial validation of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3. Psychological Assessment. 2007 Jun; 19(2): 176–88. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.19.2.176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.19.2.176

Carleton RN, Norton MAPJ, Asmundson GJG. Fearing the unknown: A short version of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale. Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 2007 Jan; 21(1): 105–17. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.03.014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.03.014

Mathes BM, Norr AM, Allan NP, Albanese BJ, Schmidt NB. Cyberchondria: Overlap with health anxiety and unique relations with impairment, quality of life, and service utilization. Psychiatry Research. 2018 Mar; 261: 204–11. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.01.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.01.002

Fergus TA. Anxiety sensitivity and intolerance of uncertainty as potential risk factors for cyberchondria: A replication and extension examining dimensions of each construct. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2015 Sep; 184: 305–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.06.017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2015.06.017

Johnson AL, McLeish AC, Alsaid-Habia T, Shear PK, Privitera M. Anxiety Sensitivity as a Predictor of Epilepsy-Related Quality of Life and Illness Severity Among Adult Epilepsy. Cognitive Therapy and Research. 2019 Feb; 43(1): 6–13. doi: 10.1007/s10608-018-9951-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-018-9951-4

Fergus TA. The Cyberchondria Severity Scale (CSS): An examination of structure and relations with health anxiety in a community sample. Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 2014 Aug; 28(6): 504–10. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.05.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.05.006

Zvielli A, Bernstein A, Berenz EC. Exploration of a Factor Mixture-Based Taxonic-Dimensional Model of Anxiety Sensitivity and Transdiagnostic Psychopathology Vulnerability Among Trauma-Exposed Adults. Cognitive Behavior Therapy. 2012 Mar; 41(1): 63–78. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2011.632436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2011.632436

Muse K, McManus F, Leung C, Meghreblian B, Williams JMG. Cyberchondriasis: Fact or fiction? A preliminary examination of the relationship between health anxiety and searching for health information on the Internet. Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 2012 Jan; 26(1): 189–96. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.11.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.11.005

Norr AM, Albanese BJ, Oglesby ME, Allan NP, Schmidt NB. Anxiety sensitivity and intolerance of uncertainty as potential risk factors for cyberchondria. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2015 Mar; 174: 64–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.11.023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2014.11.023

Lee SA and Crunk EA. Fear and Psychopathology During the COVID-19 Crisis: Neuroticism, Hypochondriasis, Reassurance-Seeking, and Coronaphobia as Fear Factors. Omega (Westport). 2022 Jun; 85(2): 483–96. doi: 10.1177/0030222820949350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0030222820949350