Common Complications of Mini PCNL in Renal Stones more than 3.0 cm

Complications of Mini PCNL in Renal Stones

Authors

  • Khalid Farooq Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Awais Ahmed District Head Quarter Hospital, Nowshera, Pakistan
  • Haris Hameed Bannu Medical College, Bannu, Pakistan
  • Ilyas Zahoor Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Najma Hameed Northwest General Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Israr Ali Khan Bannu Medical College, Bannu, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v4i11.1171

Keywords:

Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (mPCNL), Renal Stones, Complications

Abstract

Mini PCNL (mPCNL) procedures now often employ miniature nephroscopes that were originally created to treat paediatric kidney stones. There is scarcity of knowledge regarding complications of mPCNL in renal stones larger than 3 cm. Objective: To determine the common complications of mini PCNL performed for renal stones larger than 3.0cm. Methods: This descriptive case series study was conducted over a period of one year from November 2022 to October 2023 registered patients aging 4 to 14 years undergoing mPCNL with renal stones >3cm. The patients underwent mini PCNL and patients were followed over a period of 4 weeks for early (occurring within 48 hours of procedure) and late complications (occurring after 48 hours). Results: A total of 86 cases were analyzed. The age of the participants ranged from 4 years to 14 years. The mean age of the patients was 9.19±2.49 years. Majority of the participants were in the age group 10-14 years 57 (66.3%). Male to female ratio was 1.2: 1. Among the early complications, the most commonly reported was post-pain reported by 24 (28.0%) patients, followed by hematuria in 15(17.4%). Surgical site infection was the most common late complications observed in 9 patients (10.4%) followed by re-do surgery for 2 patients (2.3%) and none of the patient suffered renal dysfunction among our participants. Conclusions: MPCNL can be offered as a safe and secure surgical option with excellent results and manageable side effects for treating nephrolithiasis larger than 3cm in children.

References

Mahmood SN, Aziz BO, Tawfeeq HM, Fakhralddin SS. Mini–versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of pediatric renal stones: is smaller enough? Journal of Pediatric Urology. 2019 Dec; 15: 664.e1–e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.09.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.09.009

Baydilli N, Tosun H, Akinsal EC, Gölbaşi A, Yel S, Demirci D. Effectiveness and complications of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: one center experience with 232 kidney units. Turkish Journal of Urology. 2020 Nov; 46: 69-75. doi: 10.5152/tud.2019.19158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2019.19158

Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, Monga M, Murad MH, Nelson CP, et al. Surgical management of stones: American urological association/endourological society guideline, PART I. Journal of Urology. 2016 Jan; 196: 1153–60. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.090. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.090

Dombrovskiy V and Olweny EO. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: analysis of nationwide hospitalizations and short-term outcomes for the United States, 2001–2014. Journal of Endoscopic Urology. 2018 Nov; 32: 912–8. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0370

Guven S, Frattini A, Onal B, Desai M, Montanari E, Kums J, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children in different age groups: data from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study. British Journal of Urology. 2013 Apr; 111: 148–56.

Tian Y, Yang X, Luo G, Wang Y, Sun Z. Initial prospective study of ambulatory mPCNL on upper urinary tract calculi. Urology Journal. 2020 Sep; 17: 14–8.

Planz VB, Posielski NM, Lubner MG, Li K, Chen GH, Nakada SY, et al. Ultra-low-dose limited renal CT for volumetric stone surveillance: advantages over standard unenhanced CT. Abdomen Radiology. 2019 Mar; 44: 227–33. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1719-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1719-5

Hennessey DB, Kinnear NK, Troy A, Angus D, Bolton DM, Webb DR. Mini PCNL for renal calculi: does size matter? British Journal of Urology. 2017 Apr; 119: 39–46. doi: 10.1111/bju.13839. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13839

Agrawal MS and Agrawal M. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Indian Journal of Urology. 2010 Apr; 26: 16. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.60438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.60438

Tefekli A, Karadag MA, Tepeler K, Sari E, Berberoglu Y, Baykal M, et al. Classification of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified clavien grading system: looking for a standard. European Journal of Urology. 2008 Nov; 53: 184–90. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.06.049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2007.06.049

Ahmed F, Askarpour M-R, Eslahi A, Nikbakht H-A, Jafari S-H, Hassanpour A, et al. The role of ultrasonography in detecting urinary tract calculi compared to CT scan. Research Report in Urology. 2018 Apr; 10: 199. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S178902. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S178902

Aminsharifi A, Hosseini M-M, Khakbaz A. Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for a solitary renal pelvis stone larger than 3 cm: a prospective cohort study. Urolithiasis. 2013 Jan; 41: 493–7. doi: 10.1007/s00240-013-0589-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-013-0589-0

Aminsharifi A, Taddayun A, Niroomand R, Hosseini M-m, Afsar F, Afrasiabi MA. Laparoscopic nephrectomy for non-functioning kidneys is feasible after previous ipsilateral renal surgery: a prospective cohort trial. Journal of Urology. 2011 Dec; 185: 930–4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.10.075. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.10.075

Thapa BB and Niranjan V. Mini PCNL over standard PCNL: what makes it better? Surgery Journal. 2020 Aug; 6: e19–23. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1701225

Hosseini MM, Hassanpour A, Farzan R, Yousefi A, Afrasiabi MA. Ultrasonography-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Journal of Endourology. 2009 Nov; 23: 603–7. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2007.0213

Hosseini MM, Yousefi A, Rastegari M. Pure ultrasonography-guided radiation-free percutaneous nephrolithotomy: report of 357 cases. Springer Plus. 2015 Jun; 4: 1–5. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1078-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1078-4

Zeng G, Zhu W, Lam W. Miniaturised percutaneous nephrolithotomy: its role in the treatment of urolithiasis and our experience. Asian Journal of Urology. 2018 Aug; 5: 295–302. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2018.05.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2018.05.001

Wah TM, Kidger L, Kennish S, Irving H, Najmaldin A. MINI PCNL in a pediatric population. Cardiovascular Interventional Radiology. 2013 Dec; 36: 249–54. doi: 10.1007/s00270-012-0460-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-012-0460-7

Farouk A, Tawfick A, Shoeb M, Mahmoud MA, Mostafa DE, Hasan M, et al. Is mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy a safe alternative to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in pediatric age group in borderline stones? A randomized prospective study. World Journal of Urology. 2018 Apr; 36: 1139–47. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2231-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2231-9

Jackman SV, Docimo SG, Cadeddu JA, Bishoff JT, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW. The “mini-perc” technique: a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World Journal of Urology. 2022 Dec; 16: 371–4. doi: 10.1007/s003450050083. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003450050083

Kallidonis P, Panagopoulos V, Kyriazis I, Liatsikos E. Complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: classification, management, and prevention. Current Opinions in Urology. 2016 Jan; 26: 88–94. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000000232

Kyriazis I, Panagopoulos V, Kallidonis P, Özsoy M, Vasilas M, Liatsikos E. Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World Journal of Urology. 2015 Dec; 33: 1069–77. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1400-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1400-8

Zhu W, Liu Y, Liu L, Lei M, Yuan J, Wan SP, et al. Minimally invasive versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2015 Jan; 43: 563–70. doi: 10.1007/s00240-015-0808-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-015-0808-y

Liu B, Jia H, Li J, Zhang P, Yusufu A, Nan Y, et al. Comparison of super-mini-PCNL and flexible ureteroscopy for the management of upper urinary tract calculus (1–2 cm) in children. World Journal of Urology. 2020 Dec; 39: 195–200. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03150-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03150-x

Downloads

Published

2023-11-30
CITATION
DOI: 10.54393/pjhs.v4i11.1171
Published: 2023-11-30

How to Cite

Farooq, K., Ahmed, A., Hameed, H., Zahoor, I., Hameed, N., & Khan, I. A. (2023). Common Complications of Mini PCNL in Renal Stones more than 3.0 cm: Complications of Mini PCNL in Renal Stones. Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences, 4(11), 81–86. https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v4i11.1171

Issue

Section

Original Article

Plaudit