Success of Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy Using Flap Technique

Success of Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy

Authors

  • Rabia Aftab Department of ENT, Federal Postgraduate Medical Institute, Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Israr Department of ENT, Federal Postgraduate Medical Institute, Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Sarfraz Latif Department of ENT, Federal Postgraduate Medical Institute, Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Zeeshan Ashraf Department of ENT, Federal Postgraduate Medical Institute, Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Hafiz Adil Ikram Department of ENT, Federal Postgraduate Medical Institute, Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Ahmed Saleem Department of ENT, Rahim Yar Khan Hospital, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v7i3.3672

Keywords:

Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy, Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction, Mucosal Flap Technique, Surgical Outcomes, Postoperative Complications

Abstract

Acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction is a frequent cause of epiphora and recurrent dacryocystitis, leading to substantial impairment in quality of life. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy using mucosal flap techniques has been advocated to enhance ostium patency and reduce failure rates. Objectives: To evaluate the success rate, complications, and factors associated with outcomes of flap-based endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in patients with acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Methods: This prospective single-arm interventional study was conducted in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore, from January to June 2025. Seventy-two adults with syringing-confirmed acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction were enrolled through non-probability consecutive sampling. All underwent standardized endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy using a mucosal flap technique under general anaesthesia. Results: Seventy-two patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 42.03 ± 11.36 years and a mean disease duration of 7.97 ± 2.61 months. Most patients were female (63.9%). At 3 months, functional success was 66/72 (91.7%), anatomical success 68/72 (94.4%), and overall success 66/72 (91.7%; 95% CI 83.0–96.1), with no significant associations with baseline variables (all p>0.05). Complications declined over time; 3-month rates were infection 2.8%, granulation 5.6%, synechiae 2.8%, and restenosis 5.6%. At 1 week, infection 6.9% and granulation 11.1%. Conclusions: Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy using a mucosal flap technique provides a high success rate with low complication frequency in acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction and appears largely independent of baseline clinical variables.

References

Singla A, Ballal S, Guruvaiah N, Ponnatapura J. Evaluation of Epiphora by Topical Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Dacryocystography: Which One to Choose? Acta Radiologica. 2023 Mar; 64(3): 1056-1061. doi: 10.1177/02841851221111888. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851221111888

Araya DS, Guevara FL, Torres ES, Vinocour DF, Peláez AR, Araya Sr DS. Anatomical and Functional Alterations in Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction: A Comprehensive Review. Cureus. 2025 Aug; 17(8): 1-11.

Sethi V, Mittal HK, Tuli R. Chronic Dacryocystitis: An Insight into Bacteriology and Antimicrobial Sensitivity Pattern. Oman Journal of Ophthalmology. 2024 May; 17(2): 192-197. doi: 10.4103/ojo.ojo_116_23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ojo.ojo_116_23

Tariq M, Jamil AZ, Ali S, Khalid M, Akash A. Comparison of Endonasal Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy with External Dacryocystorhinostomy. Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology. 2021 Apr; 37(3): 1-5. doi: 10.36351/pjo.v37i3.1226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36351/pjo.v37i3.1226

Lee J and Lee DC. Delayed Unilateral Pneumocephalus After Bilateral Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy in an Elderly Patient. BioMed Journal Case Reports Clinical Practice. 2021 May; 14(5): 241540. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-241540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2020-241540

Basak B, Biswas KD, Biswas S, Choudhary A. Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy: Advantage Over External Approach. Bengal Journal of Otolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery. 2019 Aug; 27(2): 161-166. doi: 10.47210/bjohns.2019.v27i2.244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47210/bjohns.2019.v27i2.244

Naas A, Farhat S, Darwish M, Ben Naser J. Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy, Our Experience. Online Journal of Otolaryngology and Rhinology. 2019 Jul; 1(1): 522. doi: 10.33552/OJOR.2019.01.000522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33552/OJOR.2019.01.000522

Khalid A, Saleem Q, Sultan S. A Comparative Analysis: Success Rates of Endoscopic Endonasal Versus External Dacryocystorhinostomy with Silicon Tube. The Professional Medical Journal. 2025 May; 32(5): 558-564. doi: 10.29309/TPMJ/2025.32.05.8884. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29309/TPMJ/2025.32.05.8884

Ma ST, Shin S, Navale A, Woo KI. Regression Course of Ostium Granulomas Under Topical Intranasal Steroids Coverage After Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy. Scientific Reports. 2024 Jul; 14(1): 17089. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67620-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-67620-7

Peng W, Tan B, Wang Y, Wang H, Wang Z, Liang X. A Modified Preserved Nasal and Lacrimal Flap Technique in Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy. Scientific Reports. 2017 Jul; 7(1): 6809. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07364-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07364-9

Wormald PJ and Tsirbas A. Powered Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy with Mucosal Flaps. Operative Techniques in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2009 Jun; 20(2): 92-95. doi: 10.1016/j.otot.2009.01.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otot.2009.01.001

Romanos M, Medawar C, Hallit S, Romanos B. Nasal Flap Preservation in Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy for Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction. International Journal of Ophthalmology. 2024 Sep; 17(9): 1633. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2024.09.09. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2024.09.09

Vinciguerra A, Nonis A, Resti AG, Barbieri D, Bussi M, Trimarchi M. Influence of Surgical Techniques on Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery. 2021 Jul; 165(1): 14-22. doi: 10.1177/0194599820972677. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599820972677

Vatansever M and Dursun Ö. Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy with Modified Mucosal Flap Technique. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2023 May; 34(3): 216-218. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000009054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000009054

Bani-Ata M, Aleshawi A, Ahmad M, Saleh O, Ashour R, Khalil H et al. Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy: A Comparison of Double-Flap and Single-Flap Techniques. Annals of Medicine and Surgery. 2020 Jun; 54: 1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.03.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.03.005

Shahid M, Awais M, Akram A, Naqvi SA, Zafar O, Malik TM. Endoscopic Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy: Experience of Hundred Cases. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal. 2021; 71(6): 2104-2108. doi: 10.51253/pafmj.v71i6.4251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v71i6.4251

Jeong I W and Kim S D. Outcomes of Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy Using Nasal Mucosal Flaps. Korean Journal of Ophthalmology. 2021 Jul; 62(7): 881 887. doi: 10.3341/jkos.2021.62.7.881. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2021.62.7.881

Wang D, Fang P, Zhao Y. Assessment of Long-Term Outcomes Associated with a Lobulated Pedicled Nasal Mucosa Flap Technique for Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy Without Stenting. Ear, Nose and Throat Journal. 2021 Sep; 100(5): 618-623. doi: 10.1177/0145561319900025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0145561319900025

Zloto O, Koval T, Yakirevich A, Ben Simon GJ, Weissman A, Ben Artsi E et al. Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy with and without Mucosal Flap—is There Any Difference? Eye. 2020 Aug; 34(8): 1449-1453. doi: 10.1038/s41433-019-0716-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-019-0716-4

Rezaeian A, Abtahi-Forooshani M, Ghanbari MA. Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy Using Mucosal Flaps for Bilateral Overlapping. American Journal of Clinical and Experimental Immunology. 2020 Jun; 9(3): 22.

Wanumkarng N, Nimitwongsakul A, Nimkarn A, Pongpirul K. Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy Modification Techniques: A 12-Year Experience. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. 2019 Jul; 102(7): 1-6.

Hamdy HM, Mohammad MA, Elnashar IS, Nasr WF, Khamis WM, Elsayed AI. Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy with Nasal Mucosal Flaps: A Comparative Study. Pan Arab Journal of Rhinology. 2023; 13(1): 28-37. doi: 10.58595/2090-7559.1214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58595/2090-7559.1214

Patel P, Chavda AB, Ambani K, Meena L. Surgical Outcome of Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy with Nasal Flap Preservation Versus Flap Removal Technique: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Review and Research. 2023; 15(4): 368–375.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31
CITATION
DOI: 10.54393/pjhs.v7i3.3672
Published: 2026-03-31

How to Cite

Aftab, R., Israr, M., Latif, S., Ashraf, M. Z., Ikram, H. A., & Saleem, M. A. (2026). Success of Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy Using Flap Technique: Success of Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy . Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences, 7(3), 105–110. https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v7i3.3672

Issue

Section

Original Article

Plaudit