Comparative Efficacy of Low-Dose Alteplase versus Standard Dose among Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients: A Single-Centre Experience in Pakistan

Low-Dose Alteplase versus Standard Dose among Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients

Authors

  • Tariq Khan Department of Neurology, Pak Emirates Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
  • Jahanzeb Liaqat Department of Neurology, Pak Emirates Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
  • Asif Hashmat Department of Neurology, Pak Emirates Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
  • Ijaz Khan Department of Neurology, City General Hospital, Dargai, Pakistan
  • Tahir Khan Department of Neurology, Pak Emirates Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
  • Hameed Ur Rahman Department of Neurology, Pak Emirates Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v7i4.3520

Keywords:

Acute Ischemic Stroke, Alteplase, Low-Dose, Routine Clinical Practice

Abstract

Intravenous (IV) alteplase(tPA) at a dose of 0.9 mg /kg is the standard treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS), but it carries the risk of intracranial hemorrhage. Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of tPA low dose (LD; 0.6 mg/kg) as compared to standard-dose (SD; 0.9 mg/kg) in AIS patients in normal clinical practice. Methods: In this retrospective comparative cohort study, 320 AIS patients administered IV-tPA within 4.5 hours of stroke symptoms were selected in 2 groups (160 patients receiving LD; 0.6mg/kg), and 160 patients (SD; 0.9mg/kg) were developed in the Department of Neurology, Pak Emirates Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, between January 2023 and December 2024. The measured outcomes were functional independence (mRS=02) at 90-day, incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and 90-day mortality. Results: Few individuals (32.5%) in the (LD; 0.6 mg/kg) group had positive functional outcomes compared to those in the (SD; 0.9 mg/kg) group (40.0%), but the difference was not significant (p=0.152). The (LD; 0.6mg/kg) (1.9% vs. 5.6%) (p=0.038) significantly reduced the risk of sICH. There were no differences in the 90-day mortality rates between the groups (11.3% vs. 13.8%, p=0.299). Adjusted (LD; 0.6 mg/kg) was, however, associated with reduced risk of sICH (aOR 0.30; 95% CI 0.08-0.98; p=0.040) but not functional outcome (aOR 0.82; 95% CI 0.54-1.25; p=0.361). Functional outcomes were strongly predicted by age, baseline NIHSS, and treatment length. Conclusions: In routine clinical practice, (LD; 0.6 mg/kg) was selectively used in higher-risk patients and showed a promising safety profile with functional outcomes broadly comparable to (SD; 0.9 mg/kg) therapy.

References

Karedath J, Avanteeka FN, Aslam MN, Nadeem A, Yousaf RA, Shah S et al. Comparison of Effectiveness and Safety of Low-Dose Versus Standard-Dose Intravenous Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis. Cureus. 2023 Feb; 15(2). doi: 10.7759/cureus.35571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35571

Long B, Brady WJ, Gottlieb M. Fibrinolytic Uses in the Emergency Department: A Narrative Review. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2025 Mar; 89: 85-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.12.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2024.12.007

Berge E, Whiteley W, Audebert H, De Marchis GM, Fonseca AC, Padiglioni C et al. European Stroke Organization (ESO) Guidelines on Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischaemic Stroke. European Stroke Journal. 2021 Mar; 6(1): I-LXII. doi: 10.1177/2396987321989865. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2396987321989865

Liu F and Chen J. Analysis of Risk Factors for Pulmonary Infection in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Following Intravenous Thrombolysis with Alteplase. American Journal of Translational Research. 2024 Sep; 16(9): 4643. doi: 10.62347/VZQQ5140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62347/VZQQ5140

Chao AC, Han KE, Lin SF, Lin RT, Chen CH, Chan L et al. Low-dose Versus Standard-Dose Intravenous Alteplase for Octogenarian Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2019 Apr; 399: 76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2019.01.047. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2019.01.047

Li BH, Wang JH, Wang H, Wang DZ, Yang S, Guo FQ et al. Different Doses of Intravenous Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Network Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Neurology. 2022 Jun; 13: 884267. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.884267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.884267

Chen CH, Tang SC, Chen YW, Chen CH, Tsai LK, Sung SF et al. Effectiveness of Standard-Dose Vs. Low-Dose Alteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke Within 3–4.5 h. Frontiers in Neurology. 2022 Feb; 13: 763963. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.763963. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.763963

Wang H and Chow SC. Sample Size Calculation for Comparing Means. Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences. 2007 Mar: 1-0. doi: 10.1002/9780471462422.eoct006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780471462422.eoct006

Hong JM, Kim DS, Kim M. Hemorrhagic Transformation After Ischemic Stroke: Mechanisms and Management. Frontiers in Neurology. 2021 Nov; 12: 703258. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.703258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.703258

Comer AR, Templeton E, Glidden M, Bartlett S, D'Cruz L, Nemati D et al. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) Scoring Inconsistencies Between Neurologists and Emergency Room Nurses. Frontiers in Neurology. 2023 Jan; 13: 1093392. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1093392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.1093392

Cummock JS, Wong KK, Volpi JJ, Wong ST, Wong K, Wong S. Reliability of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Stroke Scale Between Emergency Room and Neurology Physicians for Initial Stroke Severity Scoring. Cureus. 2023 Apr; 15(4). doi: 10.7759/cureus.37595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37595

Rahimi F, Zarvani A, Fayedeh F, Sharifi-Razavi A. Low-Dose Vs. Standard-Dose Alteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Safety and Efficacy in an Iranian Population. BioMed Central Neurology. 2025 Sep; 25(1): 395. doi: 10.1186/s12883-025-04413-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-025-04413-z

Wang Z, Ji K, Fang Q. Low-Dose Vs. Standard-Dose Intravenous Alteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke with Unknown Time of Onset. Frontiers in Neurology. 2023 Apr; 14: 1165237. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1165237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1165237

Yang TW, Lee YH, Lo WC, Chen IT, Lin HC, Chen MH et al. Low-Dose versus Standard-Dose Alteplase in Bridging Therapy for Large Vessel Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cerebrovascular Diseases. 2025 Jan; 53(6): 657-66. doi: 10.1159/000535569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000535569

Nepal G, Kharel S, Yadav JK, Yadav SK, Bhagat R, Shing YK et al. Low-Dose Alteplase for the Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke in South Asians: A Systematic Review on Cost, Efficacy and Safety. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2022 Sep; 103: 92-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.07.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2022.07.002

Xu J, Chen X, Xie Y, Wang Y, Chen S, Dong Q et al. Low-Dose Vs. Standard-Dose Alteplase for Chinese Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Propensity Score Analysis. Frontiers in Neurology. 2023 Feb; 14: 1120547. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1120547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1120547

Sadeghi-Hokmabadi E, Ghoreishi A, Rikhtegar R, Sariaslani P, Rafie S, Vakilian A et al. Low-Dose Versus Standard-Dose Alteplase for Intravenous Thrombolysis in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke in Iran: Results from the Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke Registry. Current Journal of Neurology. 2021 Oct; 20(4): 208. doi: 10.18502/cjn.v20i4.8346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/cjn.v20i4.8346

Wang X, Li J, Moullaali TJ, Lee KJ, Kim BJ, Bae HJ et al. Low-dose Versus Standard-Dose Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke in Asian Stroke Registries: An Individual Patient Data Pooling Study. International Journal of Stroke. 2019 Oct; 14(7): 670-7. doi: 10.1177/1747493019858777. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493019858777

Zhao G, Huang T, Zheng M, Cui Y, Liu Y, Cheng Z et al. Comparative Analysis on Low-and Standard-Dose Regimes of Alteplase Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Efficacy and Safety. European Neurology. 2018 Mar 13; 79(1-2): 68-73. doi: 10.1159/000485460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000485460

Mao XL, He SS, Zhang YX, Lin CD, Chen XX, Zhang SZ et al. Low-Dose Vs. Standard-Dose Alteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Real-World Single-Center Retrospective Study. Frontiers in Neurology. 2025 Oct; 16: 1651307. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1651307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1651307

Mai DT, Dao VP, Nguyen VC, Vu DL, Nguyen TD, Vuong XT et al. Low-dose vs. Standard-Dose Intravenous Alteplase in Bridging Therapy among Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: Experience from A Stroke Center in Vietnam. Frontiers in Neurology. 2021 Apr; 12: 653820. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.653820. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.653820

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30
CITATION
DOI: 10.54393/pjhs.v7i4.3520
Published: 2026-04-30

How to Cite

Khan, T., Liaqat, J., Hashmat, A., Khan, I., Khan, T., & Rahman, H. U. . (2026). Comparative Efficacy of Low-Dose Alteplase versus Standard Dose among Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients: A Single-Centre Experience in Pakistan: Low-Dose Alteplase versus Standard Dose among Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients. Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences, 7(4), 03–08. https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v7i4.3520

Issue

Section

Original Article

Plaudit