Quality of Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) as perceived by the postgraduate residents appearing in Mid Training Assessment (MTA) during January 2022 at Rawalpindi Medical University

Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQs) as perceived by the postgraduate residents appearing in Mid Training Assessment (MTA)

Authors

  • Rizwana Shahid Department of Community Medicine, Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Asad Department of Cardiology, Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
  • Rabbia Khalid Department of Pathology, Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v3i05.200

Keywords:

Multiple Choice Questions, Mid Training Assessment, postgraduate residents, Table of Specification, problem solving

Abstract

Impartiality and reliability of Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQs) render them an ideal assessment tool for measuring higher order cognition. Objective: To determine the perception of postgraduate medical trainees pertinent to the quality of MCQs administered in Mid Training Assessment (MTA) January 2022. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out among 40 postgraduate trainees who appeared in MTA during January 2022. About 23, 12 and 05 of these trainees were doing MS and MD training at Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Holy Family Hospital and DHQ Hospital Rawalpindi respectively. Trainees were enrolled in the study through consecutive non-probability sampling. The feedback from the trainees about quality of MCQs was gathered by means of a structured questionnaire based on 5-point likert scale. Data analysis was done by using SPSS version 25.0. Results: About 67% of the trainees were pleased with the quality and construct of MCQ in their assessment in terms of illustration of the information in their stems needed to understand the clinical problem. More than 82% trainees satisfied with the time allocated for attempting MCQs papers. Only 55% trainees agreed with alignment of MCQs with given Table of Specification (TOS). Most (32.5%) wanted to have difficulty level of the MCQs in accordance with level of training. Around 27.5% and 22.5% of the residents proposed to incorporate more clinical reasoning and problem solving MCQs respectively. Conclusions: Trainees were substantially contented with the standard of MCQs. They suggested for inclusion of more clinical reasoning and problem-solving type questions in alignment with TOS.

References

Abdel-Hameed AA, Al-Faris EA, Alorainy IA, Al-Rukban MO. The criteria and analysis of good multiple-choice questions in a health professional setting. Saudi Medical Journal 2005; 26910); 1505-10.

Harper R. Multiple Choice Questions – A Reprieve. Bioscience Education 2003; 2(1): 1-6. doi.10.3108/beej.2003.02000007.

Vegi VAK, Sudhakar PV, Bhimarasetty DM, Pamarthi K, Edara L, Kutikuppala LVS, et al. Multiple-choice questions in assessment: Perceptions of medical students from low-resource countries. Journal of Education and Health Promotion. 2022; 11: 103. org.4103%2Fjehp.jehp_621_21.

Bailey PH, Mossey S, Moroso S, Cloutier JD, Love A. Implications of multiple-choice testing in nursing education. Nurse Education Today 2012; 32(6): e40-e44. doi.10.1016/j.nedt.2011.09.011.

Marsh EJ, Roediger HL, Bjorkm RA, Bjork E. The memorial consequences of multiple-choice testing. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2007; 14 (2): 194–199. doi.10.3758/BF03194051.

Belay LM, Sendekie TY, Eyowas FA. Quality of multiple-choice questions in medical internship qualification examination determined by item response theory at Debre Tabor University, Ethiopia. BMC Medical Education 2022; 22: 635. doi.10.1186/s12909-022-03687-y.

Karpicke JD and Blunt J. Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science 2011; 331: 772-775. doi.10.1126/science.1199327.

Tarrant M and Ware J. A framework for improving the quality of multiple-choice assessments. Nurse Education Today. 2012; 37: 98–104. doi.10.1097/nne.0b013e31825041d0.

Abdel-Hameed AA, Al-Faris EA, Alorainy IA, Al-Rukban MO. The criteria and analysis of good multiple-choice questions in a health professional setting. Saudi Medical Journal 2005; 26(10): 1505–10. PMID: 16228046.

Adhi MI and Aly SM. Student perception and post-exam analysis of one best MCQs and one correct MCQs: A comparative study. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association. 2018; 68(4): 570-575.

Harper R. Multiple-choice questions – A Reprieve. American bee journal. 2003; 2(1): 1-6. doi.10.3108/beej.2003.02000007.

Braddom CL. A brief guide to writing better test questions. American journal of physical medicine. 1997; 76:514-516. doi.10.1097/00002060-199711000-00015.

Clifton SL and Schriner CL. Assessing the quality of multiple-choice test items. Nurse Education today. 2010; 35: 12–16. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0b013e3181c41fa3.

Brown GTL and Abdulnabi HHA. Evaluating the quality of higher education instructor-constructed multiple-choice tests: Impact on student grades. Frontiers of Education. 2017; 2: 24. doi.10.3389/feduc.2017.00024.

Rodríguez-Díez MC, Alegre M, Díez N, Arbea L, Ferrer M. Technical flaws in multiple-choice questions in the access exam to medical specialties ("examen MIR") in Spain (2009-2013). BMC Medical Education. 2016;16: 47. doi.10.1186%2Fs12909-016-0559-7.

Dowing SM. The effects of violating standard item writing principles on tests and students: the consequences of using flawed test items on achievement examinations in medical education. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2005; 10:133–3. doi.10.1007/s10459-004-4019-5.

Case SM, Swanson DB. Constructing written test questions for the basic and clinical sciences. Philadelphia: National Board of Medical Examiners; 1998 Oct.

Fernandez RS, Méndez Díaz C, Rodríguez E. Continuing Medical Education: how to write multiple choice questions. Radiology. 2013; 55(1): 28–36. doi.10.1016/j.rx.2013.01.001.

DiDonato-Barnes N, Fives H, Krause ES. Using a table of specifications to improve teacher constructed traditional tests: An experimental design. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice 2013; 21(1): 90–108. doi.10.1080/0969594X.2013.808173.

FitzPatrick B, Hawboldt J, Doyle D, Genge T. Alignment of learning objectives and assessments in therapeutics courses to foster higher-order thinking. American journal of pharmaceutical education. 2015 Feb; 79(1): 10. doi.10.5688%2Fajpe79110.

Alade OM and Igbinosa VO. Table of specification and its relevance in educational development assessment.

Derakhshandeh Z, Amini M, Kojuri J, Dehbozorgian M. Psychometric characteristics of Clinical Reasoning Problems (CRPs) and its correlation with routine multiple choice question (MCQ) in Cardiology department. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism. 2018 Jan; 6(1):37-42.

Heist BS, Gonzalo JD, Durning S, Torre D, Elnicki DM. Exploring Clinical Reasoning Strategies and Test-Taking Behaviors During Clinical Vignette Style Multiple-Choice Examinations: A Mixed Methods Study. Journal of graduate medical education. 2014; 6(4): 709-14. doi.10.4300%2FJGME-D-14-00176.1.

Ma N, Xin S, Du JY. A peer coaching-based professional development approach to improving the learning participation and learning design skills of in-service teachers. Journal of Educational Technology & Society. 2018 Apr 1;21(2):291-304.

Kumar D, Jaipurkar R, Shekhar A, Sikri G, Srinivas v. Item analysis of multiple-choice questions: A quality assurance test for an assessment tool. Medical Journal Armed Forces India (MJAFI). 2021; 77(1): S85-89. doi.10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.11.007.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-31
CITATION
DOI: 10.54393/pjhs.v3i05.200
Published: 2022-10-31

How to Cite

Shahid, R. ., Asad, M. ., & Khalid, R. . (2022). Quality of Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) as perceived by the postgraduate residents appearing in Mid Training Assessment (MTA) during January 2022 at Rawalpindi Medical University: Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQs) as perceived by the postgraduate residents appearing in Mid Training Assessment (MTA). Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences, 3(05), 179–183. https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v3i05.200

Issue

Section

Original Article

Plaudit