Comparison of Polyfilament Suture (Vicryl Rapide-0) & Monofilament Suture (Monocryl 3-0) in the Repair of Mediolateral Episiotomies
Vicryl Rapide-0 and Monofilament Suture in the Repair of Mediolateral Episiotomies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v6i11.3493Keywords:
Episiotomy, Monocryl, Vicryl, Obstetrics, Wound Healing, PregnancyAbstract
Episiotomy remains a common obstetric procedure, and the choice of suture material can influence postoperative pain, wound healing, and maternal satisfaction. Objectives: To compare Monocryl and Vicryl Rapide for mediolateral episiotomy repair in terms of pain, wound healing, complications, and patient satisfaction. Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted at the Gynecology Department, KRL General Hospital, Islamabad, from August 2022 to October 2023. Sixty women (18–45 years) undergoing spontaneous vaginal delivery were randomized into two groups (n = 30 each). Skin closure was done with Monocryl 3-0 (study group) or Vicryl Rapide 3-0 (control group), while deeper layers were closed with Vicryl Rapide 0 in both groups. Pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Results: Baseline demographics were comparable between groups (p>0.05). The study group reported significantly lower pain at 1 hour (p=0.001), 3 hours (1.53 ± 1.41 vs. 3.30 ± 2.38, p=0.001), 6 hours (0.97 ± 1.59 vs. 2.63 ± 2.01, p=0.001), after defecation (0.63 ± 0.93 vs. 2.00 ± 1.46, p<0.001), after urination (0.53 ± 0.82 vs. 1.63 ± 1.35, p<0.001), and on day 7 (p<0.001). Wound healing was significantly better with Monocryl (p=0.005), and patient satisfaction was higher (p=0.001). No infections occurred in the Monocryl group, compared to 6.7% in the control. Conclusions: Monocryl demonstrated clear superiority over Vicryl Rapide for episiotomy repair, offering reduced pain, improved wound healing, and higher maternal satisfaction.
References
Sangkomkamhang U, Kongwattanakul K, Kietpeerakool C, Thinkhamrop J, Wannasiri P, Khunpradit S et al. Restrictive Versus Routine Episiotomy among Southeast Asian Term Pregnancies: A Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial. An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2020 Feb; 127(3): 397-403. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15982.
Soliman LE, Ghareeb MA, Abd Elhameid AA, Lashin ME. Interrupted Versus Continuous Suturing of Episiotomy: A Comparative Study. Zagazig University Medical Journal. 2020 Mar; 26(2): 287-96.
Roman MP, Ciortea R, Doumouchtsis SK, Măluţan AM, Bucuri CE, Oltean OM et al. Episiotomy and Perineal Trauma During Childbirth in Primiparous Women: Associations with Anxiety, Quality of Life, Vaginal and Sexual Symptoms in the First Year Postpartum. Frontiers in Medicine. 2025 Jun; 12: 1510417. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1510417.
Molyneux R, Fowler G, Slade P. The Postnatal Effects of Perineal Trauma on Maternal Psychological and Emotional Wellbeing: A Longitudinal Study. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2024 Mar; 294: 238-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.01.035.
Rodaki E, Diamanti A, Sarantaki A, Lykeridou A. The Effects of Perineal Tears During Childbirth on Women's Sex Life. Maedica. 2022 Jun; 17(2): 297.
Asif S, Mulic‐Lutvica A, Axfors C, Eckerdal P, Iliadis SI, Fransson E et al. Severe Obstetric Lacerations Associated with Postpartum Depression among Women with Low Resilience–A Swedish Birth Cohort Study. An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2020 Oct; 127(11): 1382-90. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16271.
Bick D, Hall J, Keighley MR. The Impact of Severe Perineal Trauma on A Woman's Relationship with Her Child: A Hidden Consequence. Midwifery. 2022; 108. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2022.103323.
Schmidt PC and Fenner DE. Repair of Episiotomy and Obstetrical Perineal Lacerations (First–Fourth). American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2024 Mar; 230(3): S1005-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.07.005.
Aydın Besen M and Rathfisch G. The Effect of Suture Techniques Used in Repair of Episiotomy and Perineal Tear on Perineal Pain and Dyspareunia. Health Care for Women International. 2020 Jan; 41(1): 22-37. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2019.1663194.
Grumitt G, Man R, Le Vance J, Turner A, Morris RK, Morton VH et al. Outcomes of Suture Material, Suture Technique, and Tissue Adhesives for Repair of Childbirth-Related Perineal Trauma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2025 Aug; 312: 114086. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.114086.
Aldhabaan SA, Hudise JY, Aldosari BF. Comparison Between Using Monocryl Suture and Polypropylene Suture in Closure of Alar Base Excision in Rhinoplasty. Plastic Surgery. 2022 Feb; 30(1): 59-62. doi: 10.1177/2292550320969651.
Nappi F. Suture Materials: Conventional and Stimulatory-Responsive Absorbable Polymers with Biomimetic Function. Biomimetics. 2025 Sep; 10(9): 590. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics10090590.
Sailakshmi MP, Misra S, Acharya S, Moharana AK, TS D, HS S. Clinical Equivalence of Monoglyde® and Monocryl® Absorbable Poliglecaprone-25 Sutures: A Single-Blind, Randomized Study. Cureus. 2023 May; 15(5). doi: 10.7759/cureus.38938.
VICRYL Rapide (Polyglactin 910) Suture: Product Information. Ethicon Wound Closure and Healing Catalog 2023. https://www.jnjmedtech.com/en-EMEA/product/vicryl-rapide-polyglactin-910-suture.
Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of Adult Pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (Vas Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), Mcgill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short‐Form Mcgill Pain Questionnaire (Sf‐MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form‐36 Bodily Pain Scale (Sf‐36 Bps), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care and Research. 2011 Nov; 63(S11): S240-52. doi: 10.1002/acr.20543.
Malmir M, Boroojerdi NA, Masoumi SZ, Parsa P. Factors Affecting Postpartum Infection: A Systematic Review. Infectious Disorders-Drug Targets Disorders). 2022 May; 22(3): 28-37. doi: 10.2174/1871526521666211129100519.
Ware Jr JE, Snyder MK, Wright WR, Davies AR. Defining and Measuring Patient Satisfaction with Medical Care. Evaluation and Program Planning. 1983 Jan; 6(3-4): 247-63. doi: 10.1016/0149-7189(83)90005-8.
Kokanalı D, Ugur M, Kuntay Kokanalı M, Karayalcın R, Tonguc E. Continuous Versus Interrupted Episiotomy Repair with Monofilament or Multifilament Absorbed Suture Materials: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2011 Aug; 284(2): 275-80. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1620-0.
Odijk R, Hennipman B, Rousian M, Madani K, Dijksterhuis M, de Leeuw JW et al. The MOVE-trial: Monocryl® vs. Vicryl Rapide™ for Skin Repair in Mediolateral Episiotomies: A Randomized Controlled Trial. BioMed Central Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2017 Oct; 17(1): 355. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1545-8.
NICE Guideline 190. Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies. Guidance. 2014 Dec. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg190.
Dencker A, Lundgren I, Sporrong T. Suturing After Childbirth—A Randomized Controlled Study Testing A New Monofilament Material. An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2006 Jan; 113(1): 114-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00803.x.
Syed SZ, Akbar M, Akhtar N, Ashraf N, Ashraf A, Manzoor S. Comparison of Vicryl Rapide Versus Chromic Catgut for Episiotomy Repair: Vicryl Rapide Versus Chromic Catgut. Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences. 2024 Jan: 79-83. doi: 10.54393/pjhs.v5i01.1003.
Kaur N, Kaur AP, Manku H, Kaur K. Comparative Study of Vicryl Polyglactin (910) Versus Chromic Catgut for Episiotomy Repair. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences. 2024 Dec; 13(1): 149-53. doi: 10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20244107.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access journal and all the published articles / items are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. For comments




