Efficacy of Membrane Sweeping in Primigravida and Effect on the Duration of Pregnancy
Membrane Sweeping in Primigravida and Effect on the Pregnancy Duration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v5i12.1939Keywords:
Membrane Sweeping, Spontaneous Delivery, Maternal Outcomes, Fetal OutcomesAbstract
Prolonged pregnancies, defined as those extending beyond 40 weeks of gestation pose increased risks to both maternal and fetal health, including higher rates of cesarean delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, and neonatal complications. Membrane sweeping is a non-pharmacological, mechanical method of labour induction that is often used to reduce the likelihood of post-term pregnancies and their associated risks. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of membrane sweeping in initiating spontaneous labour and its effect on the duration of pregnancy in women with term pregnancies. Methods: A Quasi-experimental study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, from September 2023 to March 2024. One hundred and thirty-six primigravida women aged 40 to 42 weeks who underwent membrane sweeping for labour induction were selected. Effectiveness was assessed in terms of initiation of spontaneous labour. Other parameters considered were maternal and fetal outcomes. Results: Spontaneous labour was successfully initiated in 76.5% of patients and notably reduced the mean gestational age at delivery (40.49 ± 0.591 weeks) compared to those who did not achieve spontaneous labour (41.72 ± 0.581 weeks, p=0.0001). Most patients required one or two sweeps to achieve labour, demonstrating the effectiveness of membrane sweeping in reducing pregnancy duration. Conclusions: It was concluded that membrane sweeping is an effective and non-invasive method for initiating spontaneous labour and reducing pregnancy duration, minimizing the need for medical induction and preventing post-term pregnancies.
References
Hong JG, Magalingam VD, Sethi N, Ng DS, Lim RC, Tan PC. Adjunctive Membrane Sweeping in Foley Catheter Induction of Labor After One Previous Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Trial. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2023 Jan; 160(1): 65-73. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14166.
Avdiyovski H, Haith-Cooper M, Scally A. Membrane Sweeping at Term to Promote Spontaneous Labour and Reduce the Likelihood of a Formal Induction of Labour for Post-maturity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2019 Jan; 39(1): 54-62. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2018.1467388.
Spiby H, Roberts J, Evans K, Evans C, Pallotti P, Eldridge J. Women's Information Needs, Decision-Making and Experiences of Membrane Sweeping to Promote Spontaneous Labour. Midwifery. 2020; 83. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.102626.
Tsakiridis I, Mamopoulos A, Athanasiadis A, Dagklis T. Induction of Labor: An Overview of Guidelines. Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey. 2020 Jan; 75(1): 61-72. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000752.
Saeed F, Abbasi SE, Bano N, Khan S, Jabeen K, Faraz F. Comparison Between Expectant Management and Sweeping of Membranes for Spontaneous Onset of Labour and Subsequent Mode of Delivery. Journal of The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Pakistan. 2023 Oct; 13(4): 355-9.
Ehikioya E, Nwachukwu OB, Okobi OE. Effectiveness of Single Fetal Membrane Sweeping in Reducing Elective Labor Induction for Postdate Pregnancies (38+ 0 to 40+ 6 Weeks): A Randomized Controlled Trial. Cureus. 2024 Apr; 16(4). doi: 10.7759/cureus.58030.
Twayana K, Tamrakar SR. Efficacy of Membrane Sweeping at Term Gestation to Prevent Post Term Pregnancy: A Comparative. Nepal Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2024 Jun; 19(1): 21-6. doi: 10.70241/njog103.
Pirzada H, Ehsan A, Tahir N, Fatima A. Sweeping of Membranes for Induction of Labour in Low Risk Term Pregnancy. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal. 2022 May; 72(2): 658-61. doi: 10.51253/pafmj.v72i2.6644.
Madugalle TM and Jayasundara DM. Comparative Effectiveness of and Maternal Acceptability with Cervical Ripening uSing cErvicaL Massage vErsuS Membrane Sweep (CEASELESS): A Randomized Controlled Trial. 2024. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-126016/v1.
TMSSB M, Jayasundara DM. Comparative Effectiveness of and Maternal Acceptability with Cervical Ripening Using Cervical Massage Versus Membrane Sweep (CEASELESS): A Randomized Controlled Trial. Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research. 2022; 6(3): 587-99. doi: 10.26502/acbr.50170269.
Ashmawy NE, Assar TM, Taha SM, Helmy EA. Original Article Effect of Membrane Sweeping on Induction of Labour a Randomized Controlled Trial. Benha Journal of Applied Sciences. 2020 Feb; 5(2 part (1)): 73-9. doi: 10.21608/bjas.2020.135448.
Nilvér H, Lundgren I, Elden H, Dencker A. Women’s Lived Experiences of Induction of Labour in Late-and Post-Term Pregnancy Within the Swedish Post-Term Induction Study–A Phenomenological Study. International Journal of Qualitative Studies On Health and Well-Being. 2022 Dec; 17(1): 2056958. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2022.2056958.
Ali A, Iqbal S, Rashid T. The Effectiveness of Membrane Sweeping at Term and Clinical Effects On Duration of Pregnancy. Annals of King Edward Medical University. 2021 Jul; 27(2). doi: 10.21649/akemu.v27i2.4550.
Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, Tita AT, Silver RM, Mallett G et al. Labor Induction Versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women. New England Journal of Medicine. 2018 Aug; 379(6): 513-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800566.
Bhatia A, Teo PL, Li M, Lee JY, Chan MX, Yeo TW et al. Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert (DVI) Versus Adjunctive Sweeping of Membranes and DVI for Term Induction of Labor. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research. 2021 Sep; 47(9): 3171-8. doi: 10.1111/jog.14907.
Yildirim G, Güngördük K, Karadağ Öİ, Aslan H, Turhan E, Ceylan Y. Membrane Sweeping to Induce Labor in Low-Risk Patients at Term Pregnancy: A Randomised Controlled Trial. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2010 Jul; 23(7): 681-7. doi: 10.3109/14767050903387078.
De Miranda E, Van Der Bom JG, Bonsel GJ, Bleker OP, Rosendaal FR. Membrane Sweeping and Prevention of Post‐Term Pregnancy in Low‐Risk Pregnancies: A Randomized Controlled Trial. An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2006 Apr; 113(4): 402-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00870.x.
Lella M, Shetty J, Kyalakond K, Pai MV. The Performance of Membrane Sweep in Conjunction with the Induction of Labor with Sublingual Misoprostol. Current Women's Health Reviews. 2021 May; 17(2): 110-6. doi: 10.2174/1573404816999201123162640.
Hassan AM. Membrane Sweeping to Induce Labor in Post-Term Pregnant Women: Success Rate and Outcomes. Cureus. 2023 Mar; 15(3). doi: 10.7759/cureus.36942.
Nyamzi MG, Isah DA, Offiong RA, Isah AY. Effectiveness of Sweeping of Membranes in Reducing the Incidence of Elective Induction of Labor for Postdate Pregnancies. Archives of Medicine and Surgery. 2019 Jan; 4: 15-21. doi: 10.4103/archms.archms_36_18.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access journal and all the published articles / items are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. For comments